[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting 7 July 2011

Writer's Digest, February 1992, had an article by Nancy Kress on pages 8 and 10 with the title "Order, Please." The subtitle was "How to arrange your story scenes for maximum impact."

Nancy starts out with a banker, a protagonist, and the protagonist's wife. Three events -- the banker denies the protagonist a loan that will save his business, the protagonist learns that the banker is in love with his wife, and the wife confronts the banker. Which do you show first, second, third?
"The order in which scenes are presented has a profound impact on how readers react to a story.... How do you decide what is the best order for the scenes of your story?"
Nancy points out that the first thing is to realize that you can change the order! Beginning writers often insist on chronological order, in particular, the order they thought of them in.

Then Nancy suggests some options. No matter how you do it, the first scene needs to have something interesting happening. Of coarse, your story is just brimming with interesting things, so how do you pick the best one? Well, five common choices are:
1. Start with the first crisis. Mysteries often start with a murder. Lots of stories start with a crisis that pushes the whole story along. Fairly often, this means the second scene is flashback or exposition, explaining who the characters are and how they got there. Backfill! This also means that the end of the first scene needs to have enough of a hook -- cliffhanger! -- To keep the reader going through that second scene.

2. Start with the last, major crisis. This crisis leads directly into resolving the story's conflict, so dramatizing the resolution this early may seem odd. But, handled right, you've got your reader asking, "How did the protagonist get here? What's going to happen?" So tossing this crisis in early, and then backfilling for most of the story, can actually build a lot of tension and drive. Readers want to know what happened, and how it's going to turn out.

3. Start before the crisis, with circumstances that create the crisis. Start with the first time the main characters meet, the contact with the secret agent, the future doctor starting his internship... Things that point to what's going to happen. The main advantage this has is clarity -- the reader knows what's happened, and has grown to like the main character. Disadvantage is that preliminary events may not be compelling. You may want to mix in more than just the content -- social satire, comedy, hints about what's coming.

4. Start after the crisis. Frame story. A scene long after the plot is over, then dropping back to tell the story. By giving the reader a glimpse of things to come, you hope to engage the reader. On the other hand, since the reader doesn't know the characters yet, the frame may just be boring. (tink notes: you may also lose tension -- we know the protagonist lived through all this, because he was an old man in the frame.)

5. Start with a limited dramatic scene. "A limited dramatic scene is one in which a problem is attacked by a character -- but not necessarily the problem that will form the main crisis, and not necessarily by the main character." Movies and TV shows often start with a little tiny story -- an opener that's relatively easily and quickly resolved. Thematically and causally related to the major crisis, and sometimes showing us skills of the character that will be important later, it's a way to quickly engage the reader. "The scene foreshadows a limited but dramatic form how the major crisis will evolve."
What if you're just not sure? Well, you could write three different versions. It's a lot easier just to put the scenes on note cards, with the main action, characters, feelings, motivations, and what they learn. Then try rearranging the cards. Which order works best? Play with it. (tink notes -- you could probably do the same thing in Word or your favorite editor -- make up little outlines or notes about each scene, then copy and paste in several different orders. See which one you like!)
"Considering different orders will reveal to you more about your characters than if you had just written the first order that occurred to you and regarded it as carved in 10 ton stone. No part of a first draft should be immovable."
Good advice. How do you decide where to start?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original Posting 25 Jan 2010

Writers Digest, August 2008, page 71-72 have an article by Steve Almond with the title, "Background." It starts out with the little story that follows...
"Years ago I served as a teaching assistant in a fiction class. The instructor was a sweet grouch with a penchant for dogma. One day, someone asked if there was anything the narrator had to reveal on page one. He sighed deeply. 'The narrator should tell the reader everything he needs to know in the first sentence.'"
Steve goes on to explain that the teacher emphasized that we should know who the protagonist is, where we are, and what the situation is.

Steve reminds us that he believes the Hippocratic oath of writing is: never confuse the reader. And when we thrust a reader into a story without the facts, we're confusing them!

He gives an example of a student story that starts out:
I can remember the first time I saw her It was hard to miss her that night.
When you read that, you want to know who the speaker is, who she is, where they are, and what makes her hard to miss, at least. Steve says that in the student's story, all that information was much later in the story. His suggested rewrite started out:
The first time I saw Tammy Feldman was at Deke's Sadie Hawkins bash. She was wearing a plaid mini and doing shots off my girlfriend's belly.
What do you think? Is the rewrite clearer? One thing I notice is that we still don't know who "I" am, but...

Here's another beginning. What do you think about it?
His shirt was red and his knuckles were warped and there was broken glass under his feet. He could hear shouting. He headed for the road that would take him back to her.
Guess what? This is about a protagonist who gets into a bar fight and heads for refuge with an old girlfriend. Did you guess that?

But you don't want to bury the beginning in background details, right? So which ones do you use?

Steve suggests a simple rule of thumb -- make sure the reader knows at least as much as your protagonist. In that last example, the hero knows he's in a bar, he's had a fight that made his shirt bloody, and that he's trying to escape. So let the reader know that, too.

Give the reader the facts that create the emotional significance of the scene...and they'll go right along with you.

So why do we hide information? Uncertainty -- we (the writers) aren't sure where to start, and then don't go back and revise. Insecurity -- we may try to create curiosity by hiding facts, but it isn't what happens that makes a story interesting, it's the how and the why. Arrogance -- sometimes writers think it is beneath them to explain to their readers. But if you're not writing for the reader, who are you writing for?

Steve's final paragraph...
"Readers are by nature generous creatures. They come to a story, or a novel, eager to lose themselves in an imagined world. This requires that they attach themselves to the fate of one or more characters. But this empathic bond can only occur if authors share with us -- as soon as possible -- the specific fears and desires of their creations."
Make sure your first sentence has enough background to let the readers dive in.

Write?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 24 August 2008

Make a Scene Chapter 18: Flashback Scenes

Walking through Make a Scene by Jordan Rosenfeld, we've been looking at part three, various scene types. The first scene, suspense scenes, dramatic scenes, contemplative scenes, dialogue scenes, action scenes -- and now it's time for the flashback scenes. Remembering the past . . .

Every narrative has a backstory -- the background history, facts, and so forth that push your characters along. It's all the stuff that happened before the current story. Growing up, past encounters, whatever happened before the first moment of the current story, that's your backstory. And when you dive back into it, that's a flashback.

Flashback scenes are just regular scenes, with setting, action, characters, plot, dramatic tension, cliffhangers, and whatever other bits and pieces you like in your scenes, but set in the past. They should:
  • focus on action, information, and character interactions
  • don't overdo the setting and sensory details, keep the pace rapid
  • illustrate or explain something in the front story, usually a plot or character point
  • help the reader understand the protagonist
Don't overdo flashbacks. They are a disruption in the flow of the story. Keep them short and sweet.

Transition into the past. Introducing the time setting is a tricky part of a flashback. A few words of transition and sometimes some verb tense can help. "A few days after they moved in, ..." can start a flashback about the current house. "He had spoken..." instead of "He spoke..." Or you can use a specific date or incident. Make sure the reader knows what the present date is, then clearly indicate the past date. Sometimes have the narrator tell the reader that we're re-creating the past. Or use remembrances. You can also sometimes use the trigger -- a smell, a phrase, or something else that reminds the character of their past. This also helps you get back out of the flashback into the present.

Using flashbacks. Keep them tightly focused on the information that's needed for the current story. Flashbacks often illustrate something that happened in the past which led directly to the present plot point. They can also create suspense, introducing tidbits from the events of the past to build up tension in the front story. There's usually a tension between the bits of the past and the current story in this case. You can also use flashbacks to help make a character deeper and to introduce dead characters. Absent characters can still affect the current story, and using a flashback to show their influence is one way to get around their current inactivity.

Ending the flashback. You need to transition back to the present, either returning the reader to be same point with a flashback started, or giving them a push into the current present. Since many flashbacks are very short, you don't want to the transition to be long, but be careful not to lose the reader. Make it clear that we've returned from the past to the front story.

Rosenfeld's checklist for flashback scenes:
  1. Does the flashback provide action, information, and character interaction?
  2. Does information in the flashback tie into the front story?
  3. Use the flashback likely to confuse the reader about where they are in the front story?
  4. Does the past told in the flashback directly affect the plot in the front story?
  5. Do elements of the past in the flashback create suspense in the present?
  6. Does the flashback deepen the reader's understanding of a character?
Flashbacks are kind of interesting. You may remember the advice of the King to the White Rabbit in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll? "Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop." This simple linear flow gets interrupted by flashbacks. Classical theater also indicated that there should be unity of place, time, and action. One setting, one day of time, and one sweep of action. Anything before that should be recounted by the actors -- a flashback in dialogue, but not in setting or action. And we still prefer that stories start at the beginning and sweep along in a reasonably continuous flow to the end, although we'll accept the fade-out/fade-in and other transitions especially if they help the story move along. But those hops back in time . . . well, if we have to, we'll put up with them, but don't do it too much.

Incidentally, I found that this was one of the key differences between TV mysteries and samurai dramas here in Japan for me as a learner. The mysteries would often have talking heads discuss something that happened yesterday, and if I got lost in the chatter, then I had no idea what had happened. The samurai dramas, though, would say something like, "Yesterday I was at the bar . . . " and pop - we'd have a live flashback scene showing just what happened at the bar. Much easier for someone who was struggling with the language to understand.

So - your assignment? Okay, how about looking at your story, and finding some point of character backstory that really needs to be explained. And then put together the flashback to show it to us. Maybe it's their anger, maybe it's the gentle way they treat children, or whatever, but give us a short flashback to show us why they act that way. Make sure that the transition into it is clear, that the essential point is made, and that we get led back to the front story.

Now where were we? Oh, yes, once upon a time . . . and it happened just that way!
Write?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writers Digest, September 2004, page 10 has a quick tip by Erika Dreifus. Basically, Erika points out that when we are looking for telling details about a character, it can be useful to remember that everyone has to earn a living. Work situations are familiar and an important part of real life, so use them to help enrich the story with believable details. Some prompts to help you define the character:
1. Write your character's resume
2. Write your character's current job description
3. Write your character's fantasy job description -- what would they like to be doing?
4. Fill out a job application for your character
5. Describe your character through a coworker's eyes
6. describe your character's greatest professional accomplishment
7. Describe your character's greatest professional regret or failure
8. Write a scene in which your character confronts a challenge at work
Now Erika doesn't suggest these, but they are obvious twists. For one thing, give your character a yearly review. What does their boss think about their work? What about a customer or client -- what do they think about your character? How about the company or business - is it doing well, slipping, maybe about to go under?

Put your character to work - and let that work show in the story.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting: Sat, 17 Sep 1994 18:35:03 JST

I thought someone asked about using the term "old" to describe a character, but having reached the point where I want to respond, I can't find the message.

Oh, well. I think the question was whether or not there was a problem with using this term. (I'll refer to "old man" in the following, but the same kind of problems do occur for old women, too...please adjust to suit your gender biases, okay?)

Offhand (which means I'm making this up as I go along, so bear with me--no points for explaining how confused I am!) it seems as if there are several problems with such terms. First, since age is relative, an "old man" to a college student might be anyone over 30. More mature readers might peg the same "old man" as someone farther advanced in years. If the relative age of the person is significant to the story, it may very well be better to pin it down more precisely, and perhaps add a bit more characterization at the same time.

e.g. "She could see he was old, since he was studying the calculus book for a college sophomore. She held her breath as she spilled her milk on the table so she would have a reason to talk to him." or "He had been old for the last 20 years, ever since the draft board sent him to Vietnam." or maybe "He remembered the Great Depression in the 1930's because his father had jumped into Time Square from a skyscraper, and a twelve-year old boy had suddenly become the family breadwinner at a time when no one had bread. The television news about 'hard times' made him snort." or something--I know you can do better!

Second, such generic terms sometimes are just fillers, and may be surprising when something clears up the misconceptions they suggest. E.g., if I read that so-and-so is old, I think of someone over retirement age (at least--that's about 20 years ahead of me!) When I suddenly realize that the narrator is a high school girl looking at the "over-the-hill" college youths...I have a momentary queasiness as I readjust. It's not nice to fool your reader!

Third, old relative to who? As a writer, you want to draw your reader in to "passive participation" in the POV--the narrator (at least) is me! And since you want your readers to be drawn from every age group, "old" isn't terribly helpful. I (teenie-bopper reader) see this "old" crone mentioned, and know it's really someone about 25! I (retiree enjoying the sunshine in Acapulco) see the "old" person mentioned, and know it's someone in their 90's on full life-support in a hospital, not someone my age!

What characteristics are really important to the story, to the people, to what you are trying to do? Admittedly, age often is significant, but not always. If the age of the person doesn't do anything except identify them, it may be time to think about just what they are doing in the story, and what really identifies them.

The word "old" in itself isn't a problem for me. The notion that this might be the complete description is--does age (especially such a relatively vague indication!) really provide a good, sharp, memorable characterization which does what is needed in the story? Or are there a few more specific bits and pieces you can use to really make the "old man" stand out? Tell me about the sharp smell of the hospital soap he showers with every morning, or the way he peers at the headlines--and mistakes even that large print. Perhaps describe the quivering, slow descent into a chair, with a whoosh of breath released when he has safely avoided the dangers of this complex maneuver.

Or perhaps you didn't really mean an "old" man--just someone in the prime of their life? Hair receding, stomach slowly protruding, once-stylish clothes on their second or third approach to being current...

Hope this helps. Generally, relative adjectives such as "old" seem deceptive to me--they don't provide a very firm description if it is needed, and they are irritatingly likely to be mistaken if they aren't needed.

Try specifics instead. Resist the urge to explain what the specifics mean--just let your characters tell us about what they've seen and heard and felt, I'll figure out just how old or young they are relative to me, the reader...

[we'll pass lightly over the question of what family of oxymoronic delights the commandment "try specifics" belongs in--the paradoxes of high level abstractions are so much fun...]

ye witchdoctor--here, have a sip from the fountain that Poncie was looking for. Now, how old do I look? Really, you can tell me...

probably muddied the waters completely, huh?

(WHAT? I'm not that old!)
tink
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Fri, 25 Mar 1994 18:35:01 JST

A Worksheet for "developing" a character

[NOTE: these are points which some writers feel are interesting/useful to lay out before writing. You don't have to fill in everything, but you might find it interesting to consider some of these points. Feel free to add, subtract, or ignore - after all, it is your character.

Personal tip: Stick to the parts that are likely to influence the plotline... ELABORATE THOSE IN DETAIL!]

Personal (Physical)
Name:
Age:
Birthdate:
Birthplace:
Height:
Weight:
Measurements: (or body type - skinny, etc):
Hair:
Eyes:
Eyebrows:
Scars:
Carriage:
Voice Quality, speed, sound:
Nose:
Mouth:
Proportions:
Face:
Body:
Marital Status:
Educational Background:
Occupation:
Food Preferences:
Drink Preferences:
Alcoholic Drinks:
Breakfast:
Car:
Pets:
Eccentricities:
Personality Profile
strong/weak characteristics:
sees self as:
seen by others as:
basic nature:
ambition:
philosophy:
beliefs:
hobbies:
kinds of reading material, art, music:
favorite color:
description of current home life:
clothes (type/style, fit, condition, colors):
shape/condition of hands and nails:
moral values/sexual beliefs and practices:
how does s/he handle problems?
Present Problem:
How does this problem get worse?
How does this problem get resolved?
Most important thing to know about person?
Most important trait to know about person, and why?
Does character have a secret? What?
Previous relationships and effect on present:
Synopsis about childhood:
Family History
Spouse:
Occupation:
Location:
Type of Relationship:
Effect on Plotline:

Best Friend:
Marital Status:
Occupation:
Location:
Type of Relationship:
Effect on Plotline:

Mother:
Physical Status:
Marital Status:
Occupation:
Location:
Type of Relationship:
Effect on Plotline:

Father:
Physical Status:
Marital Status:
Occupation:
Location:
Type of Relationship:
Effect on Plotline:

Name of Maternal Grandparents:
Physical Status:
Marital Status:
Occupation:
Location:
Type of Relationship:
Effect on Plotline:

Name of Paternal Grandparents:
Physical Status:
Marital Status:
Occupation:
Location:
Type of Relationship:
Effect on Plotline:

Children (repeat as needed)

Name:
Age:
Type of Relationship:
Location:
Occupation:
Spouse:
Grandchildren:
Effect on Plotline:

Brothers/Sisters (repeat as needed)

Name:
Age:
Type of Relationship:
Location:
Occupation:
Spouse:
Children:
Effect on Plotline:
Outside Effects
External affairs, events, etc. with relationship to character:
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Fri, 17 Jun 1994 11:24:17 JST

Not to co-opt whatever it is you're into, but it does seem as though there is a thread of rejection of stereotypes as a valid method of labeling an individual somewhere in the muddle...

[by which rather clumsy device, pray allow me to reintroduce an elderly topic with some relationship to ... writing!]

It seems to me that most of the rejection of stereotypes (and other labels) runs on several legs.

Imprimus (that's a fancy first!), there is the problem that a label tends to "suck up" and "cover over" attributes and characteristics that identify individuals. E.g., having said someone is born in a certain time, one is likely to generalize some feature of some people also born in that era (what I have so elegantly called "sucking up") and then attempt to claim that all those born at that time somehow share that feature - simply due to their birthday (and the "cover up"). From here, one can easily move into astrology.

Secondus, while there may have been some kind of reasoning (or semi-reasoning) process involved in developing a label, in use one often skips re-introducing the reasoning. Perhaps the "shorthand" form is sufficient for ordinary miscommunication, but in the pursuit of better writing, one should take some care to reinforce the forgotten chains of stereotypical development. E.g., instead of simply saying "He was a WASP, and therefore had lots of money," take the time to introduce his family, allude to their humble abode on Fifth Avenue, perhaps even bring in the yacht and the "summer cottage" in New Hampshire - one need never mention the quantity of money carried in his paper bag as he shuffled around Central Park one step ahead of the police. Really. Just let people know that he was a "free-lance recycling agent, specializing in aluminum cans and beer bottles."

Tertius (we want a firm stand, so we need at least a tripod), so many labels, although perhaps convenient in some way, have no evident logic behind them. What difference does being born during the same period make? Granted, there was a statistical bulge related to a period of sexual irrelationships attributable to a war. How much convergence did social and cultural influence have during this period? Would the ex-farmer who went to college and then (horrors!) left Ohio after the war raise children in the same way that his closest friend who went back to the family farm after the war did? For that matter, did New York city and down-field Kansas (to take two examples) suddenly grow homogenized during this period?

Well, that's a three-legged push towards discussing stereotypes and individuals in writing. As I've stated once before, I find ordinary people, who often resemble the stereotypes, somewhat interesting as subjects of writing. Still, it seems to me, the more I think about this, that the focus on individuals in writing implies that even when describing a person who fits into a stereotypical mold quite well, it is extremely important to "break the person out of the mold" and make them a living, breathing individual...

Perhaps we might consider how to take a stereotype and characterize the character in sufficient depth to take the person out of the stereotype?

Or, of course, we can return to the exchange of generational myths. (does anyone have a list of heroes, villians, and archtypes by generation? when's the test on this, anyway?)
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Wed, 23 Feb 1994 18:35:01 JST

(maybe it's an essay?)

I noticed that we've hit again the topic of that evil little box lurking in the corner of most homes (if not occupying a central shrine where the devotees gather for regular services). Not to argue with anyone, but I do have a few thoughts on the topic.

(what! the overall level of writing, characters - if you can call them that -, the plotting, etc. STINKS!)

true. there are occasional exceptions - perhaps even a higher percentage than in printed novels, for example - but in general, true. Don't watch the tube to learn good writing.

One hesitation - advertising tends to be extraordinarily effective in terms of catching the listener and getting a message across. Sometimes it is worth studying.

And there was a flash in the corner of my eye - oh, yes. Some of the visual hints - how they establish a scene, a mood, an identity through the details shown sometimes is quite good (even in poorly written shows). Worth a look or two...

But, in general, you are absolutely correct - the level of T.V. broadcasting doesn't provide a very challenging target in terms of story handling technique.

(do you really think it's safe for people to waste hours and years of their life as passive addicts of mindless entertainment and stimulation? That damn noisy box sucks!)

true. even the roman circuses had to stop regularly for food, collecting more Christians, sleep for the lions, and so on. the tube, with vcr, cable, and other technological boosts, can easily absorb all the time you are willing to give it.

(well, then - be like Elvis and pop the tube!)

no. Elvis wanted to run and hide, and did. But writers can't afford that luxury.

The T.V. can be a magic window opening on far places, news, sights and sounds around the world, and the person next door. In that role, it is indispensable to the modern writer.

Further, the T.V. is, in some ways, the "Bible" of modern culture - the "common cultural background" which the writer needs to be well-acquainted with to extract metaphors, similes, and other items to touch the larger audience. It doesn't matter whether you use them as is or break them for shock or schlock - you have to know them to use them effectively.

Also, the T.V. is part of the cultural explosion reaching those who aren't in the heart of the beast. We saw a recent documentary of a Japanese man who went up the Amazon and into the life of an Indian tribe far from everything. Only 71 members left alive, and the biggest killer is the common cold! Lots of interesting little facts and sights, but one of the most impressive to me was what they recommended this modern day adventurer take as presents for the tribe. Videotape movies.

That night, under the huge roof, the head of the tribe fired up a gas generator, turned on their T.V. set, and showed them one of the new movies - a shipwreck disaster flick (not sure which one - I missed the name and they all look alike...). Utter silence, intense little eyes and older ones clustered around, watching and learning about the big world out there...

One of those kids may be one of your readers in years to come. And they'll know what you are talking about because you share the same culture of the tube!

Even closer to home - while there have been attempts to "standardize" curricula in the schools, I think the strongest homogenizing factor is that dratted tube. Fads, catchy phrases, and so on spread remarkably quickly now - at least in part because someone is watching that escape hatch from the narrowness and smallness of local reality.

(what, you want me to spend all my time in a daze watching the tube? when do I write?)

no. consider the t.v. as a magic window, opening up the heart and soul of ordinary life and ordinary people for you. What you find there may be appalling, even shocking, but don't break the window. Pull back the curtains now and then and glance into it, gaze at some parts and steal some notions of what the backstreets of Los Angeles look like, then close the curtains again and get back to work with a wider knowledge of what's out there than you can get without taking advantage of the technology.

I hate to say it, but those one or two hour vacations by tele-vision to the other side of the world are a lot cheaper when you take them on the public tour. Admittedly, you can't stop and walk aside, or ask questions while the tour director is running their mouth - but with a vcr, you can stop and look at details, and you really don't have to take the whole trip... I've become cunning about cutting the sound if I just want to watch the background and people, and don't really care what the idiot commentary is.

The tool isn't the problem - don't break the telescope just because your neighbors insist on watching girls through it. keep your eye on the glimpses of beach and ocean, the sea waves curling in the background, and the dolphins dancing... that's a pretty wonderful telescope to play with!

(stay tuned - more after this commercial break!:-)
tink
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 11:08:47 EST

Most of us have heard of the deus ex machina ("god out of the machine")--where Euripides would use a mechanism to usher in a god (or the power of a god) to rescue the hero or untangle some wrinkle in the plot. Aristotle taught us to avoid it, preferring that the resolution grow from the action.

[and yes, a fortuituous natural disaster, "accidental" coincidences, and similar "out of the blue" bits also fall into this class of cheap plot solutions.]

So we know to avoid artificial devices for resolving difficulties in our writing. The hero/ine needs to make their own breaks, the villian hang themselves with their own ropes, and so forth.

But I want to warn against a tendency I've noticed in some SF/F novels of the last few years. It's the "diablo ex machina" style of character development, especially for the antagonist or villian.

Specifically, in answer to questions such as why does the "bad guy" prefer sex with little children? (or have some other less than appetizing personality trait or quirk)

Simple, s/he's the president of a megacorporation. (or maybe the child of a rich person...)

Or s/he's the politically appointed head of the welfare department. (cabinet post, whatever...the political appointment seems to be the tarbrush)

S/he's a manager.

S/he's a rock singer.

S/he grew up in New York. (well, that one might be...no, that's silly)

I.e., in response to the opportunity to show us where this kind of character fault comes from, the answer is to point to their position, group, or something similar.

I always feel cheated when the author pulls this. Presidents of megacorporations don't automatically have bad personalities. Even the children of presidents aren't automatically bad characters.

Success doesn't automatically mean someone is in league with the devil!

My advice is, don't pull your devil out of the machinery--make them real. Make them someone that might very well be sitting at the corner table in the restaurant, winking at you. Make them people that the reader can believe might be living next door... take the time and do some research into the real causes of whatever antisocial traits you want to endow your bad guys with.

And I think your readers will thank you, for making that "bad guy" just a touch more real than the diablo ex machina.

Oh, and don't forget--no gods from the machinery, either.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Make a Scene Chapter 18: Flashback Scenes

Walking through Make a Scene by Jordan Rosenfeld, we've been looking at part three, various scene types. The first scene, suspense scenes, dramatic scenes, contemplative scenes, dialogue scenes, action scenes -- and now it's time for the flashback scenes. Remembering the past . . .

Every narrative has a backstory -- the background history, facts, and so forth that push your characters along. It's all the stuff that happened before the current story. Growing up, past encounters, whatever happened before the first moment of the current story, that's your backstory. And when you dive back into it, that's a flashback.

Flashback scenes are just regular scenes, with setting, action, characters, plot, dramatic tension, cliffhangers, and whatever other bits and pieces you like in your scenes, but set in the past. They should:
  • focus on action, information, and character interactions
  • don't overdo the setting and sensory details, keep the pace rapid
  • illustrate or explain something in the front story, usually a plot or character point
  • help the reader understand the protagonist
Don't overdo flashbacks. They are a disruption in the flow of the story. Keep them short and sweet.

Transition into the past. Introducing the time setting is a tricky part of a flashback. A few words of transition and sometimes some verb tense can help. "A few days after they moved in, ..." can start a flashback about the current house. "He had spoken..." instead of "He spoke..." Or you can use a specific date or incident. Make sure the reader knows what the present date is, then clearly indicate the past date. Sometimes have the narrator tell the reader that we're re-creating the past. Or use remembrances. You can also sometimes use the trigger -- a smell, a phrase, or something else that reminds the character of their past. This also helps you get back out of the flashback into the present.

Using flashbacks. Keep them tightly focused on the information that's needed for the current story. Flashbacks often illustrate something that happened in the past which led directly to the present plot point. They can also create suspense, introducing tidbits from the events of the past to build up tension in the front story. There's usually a tension between the bits of the past and the current story in this case. You can also use flashbacks to help make a character deeper and to introduce dead characters. Absent characters can still affect the current story, and using a flashback to show their influence is one way to get around their current inactivity.

Ending the flashback. You need to transition back to the present, either returning the reader to be same point with a flashback started, or giving them a push into the current present. Since many flashbacks are very short, you don't want to the transition to be long, but be careful not to lose the reader. Make it clear that we've returned from the past to the front story.

Rosenfeld's checklist for flashback scenes:
  1. Does the flashback provide action, information, and character interaction?
  2. Does information in the flashback tie into the front story?
  3. Use the flashback likely to confuse the reader about where they are in the front story?
  4. Does the past told in the flashback directly affect the plot in the front story?
  5. Do elements of the past in the flashback create suspense in the present?
  6. Does the flashback deepen the reader's understanding of a character?
Flashbacks are kind of interesting. You may remember the advice of the King to the White Rabbit in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll? "Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop." This simple linear flow gets interrupted by flashbacks. Classical theater also indicated that there should be unity of place, time, and action. One setting, one day of time, and one sweep of action. Anything before that should be recounted by the actors -- a flashback in dialogue, but not in setting or action. And we still prefer that stories start at the beginning and sweep along in a reasonably continuous flow to the end, although we'll accept the fade-out/fade-in and other transitions especially if they help the story move along. But those hops back in time . . . well, if we have to, we'll put up with them, but don't do it too much.

Incidentally, I found that this was one of the key differences between TV mysteries and samurai dramas here in Japan for me as a learner. The mysteries would often have talking heads discuss something that happened yesterday, and if I got lost in the chatter, then I had no idea what had happened. The samurai dramas, though, would say something like, "Yesterday I was at the bar . . . " and pop - we'd have a live flashback scene showing just what happened at the bar. Much easier for someone who was struggling with the language to understand.

So - your assignment? Okay, how about looking at your story, and finding some point of character backstory that really needs to be explained. And then put together the flashback to show it to us. Maybe it's their anger, maybe it's the gentle way they treat children, or whatever, but give us a short flashback to show us why they act that way. Make sure that the transition into it is clear, that the essential point is made, and that we get led back to the front story.

Now where were we? Oh, yes, once upon a time . . . and it happened just that way!
Write?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 23:45:59 -0400

Okay, a little harried, but consider this one...

First, pick something that you don't like, or are actively afraid of.  Ants? Spiders?  That ugly oily slick that tried to absorb you that summer?  Tigers?  The grinding gears of the sausage machine, that inexorable gnashing, clashing, crunching?

Second, list some of the pieces of that which really bother you.  Maybe it's the itty bitty legs on the ants?  Or the smell?  The way the gears seem to vanish into each other?

Third, walk through your fear, slowly and carefully.  Do you sweat?  Does your mouth turn dry?  Shaky knees?  Quivering fingers?  Hair stand up on your arm as the goosepimples tighten?

Fourth, translate!  Suppose that instead of the little ants, the blanket on your bed acquired some of those characteristics?  The beady little eyes on your vest?  Or maybe the bath water decides to act as if it were that oily slick?  What if the car engine decided to grind, and crunch, and gnash?

Write up that scene, where your character confronts your fear, embodied as another.  When the graveyard begins to grin like the tiger...

Write!
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 22:00:00 -0500

(Still turning?)

Backgrounds and Projections

Let's consider more additions to what you are communicating to your audience about the turning points in your life.  First, what is it about your background that makes the turning point you selected significant for you?  Is there an event in your past, or maybe more than one, that really provides the setting for this turning point?  Or suppose you wanted to foreshadow this turning point in something that happened to you earlier -- perhaps a similar opportunity that didn't work out?

Make a list of two or three background points that lead into this turning point.  Consider whether you want to write up one of these points as a flashback.  What would be the scene, and the action, and the characters that would help your audience understand the background of this turning point?

Or, you may want to consider projecting the results of this turning point into the future.  You may not have experienced yet all of the benefits and costs involved in this decision or choice, but you may be thinking ahead, expecting that out of this will come something special.

As with the background, think about several possible future points that may come out of this turning point.  Then consider writing one of these as a flashforward.

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 11:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios