[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 2 March 2010

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"Successful freelancers know they have to take the details seriously. Nothing stands out in a query letter more than a glaring error, and respecting AP style is one of those editorial no-brainers." Marnie Engel Hayutin
Another piece of advice about making sure that the details are right -- so that the editors don't trip over them. Spelling, grammar, AP style or whatever style is appropriate, get the little stuff right so that slush readers, editors, and so forth don't pay attention to that. You want them to pay attention to your story, the big picture that you're trying to show them. If they trip over extra apostrophe's, miss spellings, or even, the extra, commas... they might miss a really good show!

It's that notion again of making the frame invisible. Sure, we can do a baroque or rococo style presentation, calling attention to our literary word choices and extravagant use of punctuation, but by and large, that's unlikely to sell a story. So think about polishing those details.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 2 Feb 2010

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"You have to be very clear and straightforward so an editor knows exactly what you're proposing, how well you're equipped, what material might be there, etc. But at the same time, they're listening to your voice. I think it's the voice as much as anything that really sells the story." Caroline Alexander
Now that's an interesting observation -- voice, not story, is what sells? I suppose if we consider music, many of the classical operas and other pieces are well-known, so it is the voice, the performance, that really sells. But normally we consider that writing is somewhat different. Still, the basic plots, many of the characters, settings... so much of it is tried and true. That's when the writer's voice becomes important. I see arguments that many of Shakespeare's plays are based on older material, and yet... it's Shakespeare's plays that we all remember.

Craft and art? There's a tension between the craft side of writing, where we want to make the words and the structure almost transparent to the reader, so that they submerge themselves in the story, and the art side, where the words and sentences and the arrangement sings to the reader, calls them into enjoyment, seduces them. Not too much, or someone will notice the powder on your characters' cheeks, the paper moon, and the other bits and pieces of the setting. But not too little, either, because it is your story, after all.

Write?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Originally posted 27 Jan 2010

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"Sending out the same query to separate publications (simultaneous submissions) gives you more opportunities to get published, but it can also ruin your chances with editors if they know it's been submitted elsewhere -- especially to a competitor -- unless they accept simultaneous submissions." Brian A. Klems
Given all the warnings about not making simultaneous submissions unless submission guidelines specifically say it's OK, I would've almost thought this was a no-brainer. Of course you avoid simultaneous submissions, right?

And then I saw someone ranting about the stupidity of editors -- on an editor's forum, no less. The gist of their argument was that given the lengthy response times for slush pile submissions, of course writers had the right to make simultaneous submissions. How would the editors catch them? And so on.

There was a part of me that said, "Yeah, good point. Long response times, simultaneous submissions make sense." But as a slush pile reader gently pointed out, editors talk. And if one house has this great story, and it sounds just like that one over there... or even worse, suppose you withdraw your story, and then the editor notices that some other house just signed a contract with you.

Editors have long memories. Burn them once, and later when you want some friendly help, you may find them pointing to the scar of that burn and saying, "Not again."

So, follow the guidelines. If it says no simultaneous submissions, don't do it. Just go ahead and work on another book and submit it somewhere else while you're waiting.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 5 Jan 2010

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"Try narrowing your focus or offering a unique point of view, then offer as much detail as you can about how you'd organize the piece and whom you'd interview. List actual names you know you can get, instead of vaguely referencing 'experts in the field.' Then tell the editor why you're just the writer to do it." Kristin D. Godsey
Another quote that seems to be aimed at the nonfiction side of the house -- although it's probably good advice for fiction writers too. Instead of telling us the history of the universe in three pages or similar wide views of the world, focus on a human-size story. Tell us about someone that we can identify with, doing something that is believable. In a particular place, with very real surroundings and characters. If your little town is in Kansas, we may not be able to find it on Google maps, but we should have the feeling that is an error in the maps -- that is just in between those other three little towns, and it's got that willow tree on the bank of the stream, and the ice cream shop on the main street. Avoid generics -- there may be cheaper, but you want reader recognition. Which means details, specifics, someplace that is waiting just around the edge of your page.

OK? Not a big city, but New York City, Milwaukee, Chicago, San Francisco, or some other particular place. Small towns -- make us feel as if we would recognize it, if we drove through it. And make the people live and breathe.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 1 January 2010

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"Try not to send too many pitches at once. You can overwhelm an editor. No more than four for short pieces, one or two at the most for major articles." Margo True
Back when writers was at nodaka on bitnet, and I was reading things from Japan, there was some argument or something... and I posted a whole slew of stuff, message after message. Someone wrote to me offline and suggested that I was burying my own message in the morass (or something like that). I thought about that, and have tended to post only one or two messages a day ever since. It helps me to focus on getting one good message through (instead of trying to hit my target with a shotgun of messages in the general vicinity) and avoids burying the reader.

I figure the same thing applies to editors (and slush readers, etc.). If you bury them in a pile of stuff, they are more likely to just toss the whole mess without bothering to read each one. Put a few tasty ones right in front of them... and they are more likely to pay attention.

Don't avalanche -- pitch.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 19 Dec 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"Surprise the editor. I'm amazed by the blandness of many queries. Remember: your proposal is sitting in a stack of proposals, being read by editors who don't want to bother with it. Everything about your query -- the subject, the ways it's written -- should make an editor say, 'Wow, this is really different.'" Ken Budd
What's funny about this one is the contrast -- after all those suggestions that you make sure to use a standard format, same old font, and all that, here's Ken Budd recommending that you surprise the editor? Of course, I think he's pushing at a different level -- make the query/proposal/idea REALLY GOOD! Not strange paper, not odd typography, but a story that needs to be told, an idea that makes the editor sit up and say "I WANT THAT STORY!" Which is hard, because these are professionally bored people, who have seen it all before... but if it is your story, told from your heart, it can do it.

Anyway -- make your tale something that the editor wants to read. Even after reading all day.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 9 December 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"Always pitch a particular idea an editor can say yes to. Even if you get a rejection, the editor may decide you're right for a different idea she's been kicking around." David A. Fryxell
The interesting thing here is that David is saying go ahead and try those ideas out -- you're building a relationship, not a one time attempt. So give the editor ideas that you think they will like, but don't worry too much about a rejection that says not quite right for us at this time, but liked the writing (or whatever). Next time, maybe they'll recognize the name, and maybe they'll come back with something else that they would like you to do.

I think this gets back to the notion of building a portfolio -- having multiple stories and even multiple novels that you are feeding into the system. Of course, there's the "this writer is hot so publish anything" syndrome that seems to hit some of them, where they are apparently cleaning out their backlog of stories that aren't quite as good as they should be. If you happen to get hot, think about whether you really want to toss the publishers stuff that your readers will not really like -- sure, it's quick money, but you want to maintain a relationship with your readers too. Anyway...

Get those ideas out there, keep them out there, keep playing...
write?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting 8 December 2009

Just a quick exercise. Take this phrase and build on it -- a story, a poem, a reminiscence, a musing -- whatever takes your fancy. It's up to you.

The phrase: "petty secrets sharpened against hard and stony regret..."

Go ahead. What kind of an edge, what kind of point, and what do you do with petty secrets sharpened against hard and stony regret? Can you shave with them? What are you likely to cut with those petty secrets? And what kind of bandages will you need to bind up the wounds?

Write!

The phrase was found in a collection of random quotations at http://www.quotationspage.com/random.php3 -- the particular quotation was, "Success is meaningless if you can't sleep at night because of harsh things said, petty secrets sharpened against hard and stony regret, just waiting to be plunged into the soft underbelly of a 'friendship.'" Margaret Cho
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 8 December 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"There's a fine line between pestering editors and letting them forget about you. You have to give them time to react to your query before you contact them. Also, be flexible. Often times people will propose something I like, but it will work better as a shorter piece or with a different focus. I like it when a writer says, 'OK, I can do that.'" John Willoughby
I used to do reviews for one of the professional journals. One of the editors commented that one of the reasons they liked working with me was that I didn't argue when they needed to cut something to make it fit the available space, and I responded quickly to requests for changes. I think part of this was my early experience working with a small community newspaper, where I learned about fitting words into the available space.

Anyway, learning to work with editors is part of the publication game. In fact, you may have more than just a single editor to work with. And in some ways, while you know your story best, the editors and others know their audience and their publication best -- so if they suggest changes, at least consider them. The key here is reaching the audience, and they may have some ideas to make that better.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 4 Dec 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:

"While waiting for a response, one of the best ways to relieve the anxiety is to dive into your next book. Not only does it take your mind off the wait, but it also prepares you for the possibility that the editor will want to buy your next book, too." Robin Gee

This is especially important given the kinds of response times for the publishing industry. It takes a while for your story or novel to move through the slush pile to get read, and if it doesn't get an automatic first rejection, well, you're probably looking at even longer. So don't expect instant responses. And while you're waiting -- keep writing!

Another trick here is that having one golden egg out there being looked at makes it more painful when there are rejections or even comments. Having several pieces making the rounds reduces that anxiety, and provides you with some alternatives when an editor says "I liked this piece, but it wasn't quite what I was looking for." Now you've got something to send them while they still have a chance of remembering who you are.

So... write, submit, and keep submitting. And while you're waiting -- write some more!

Just a story every week makes the editors go round, editors go round, editors go round... well, okay, it isn't great verse or even a spoonful of sugar, but...

Write, okay?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 3 Dec 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:

"Always read and reread your manuscript to be sure it's clean -- no grammar, punctuation and spelling errors. And make sure the story idea is appropriate for the publication to which you are submitting." Maria Witte

Read and reread -- but first you probably need to set it aside so that you can look at it with fresh eyes. That's one of the reasons to have several pieces of work going, to help you get away from one manuscript so that you can look at it as a reader. They used to suggest that you should proofread from the ending -- reading backwards. I'm not sure that I've ever seen anyone actually doing that, because it's really hard to convince yourself to read one word at a time.

Anyway, again the notions are to make sure that the presentation doesn't distract from your story. Grammar, punctuation, spelling -- strange paper -- anything that makes the slush reader and editor have to stop and think for a moment, gives them a chance to set your story aside and reject it. You want them to fall into your story and just keep reading, without ever noticing that there are words there. So make the grammar, punctuation, spelling, style is clean and transparent as you can.

Write?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 21 November 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"Some general formatting rules for book manuscripts: use 1-inch margins all around. Double-space to get about 25 lines per page. Avoid fancy fonts; stick to Courier New or Times New Roman font in 12-point size. Don't make page headers or chapter headings boldface, and don't bother putting fancy artwork beside the book title (or anywhere else in the manuscript)." Kim Campbell
Another comment about being your manuscripts boring. Just use standard formatting. Normal margins, double-spaced, regular fonts in regular sizes. Keep the headings normal. No art...

Its almost like a frame for your story. You don't want the frame to be fancier than the story, to pull the attention away from the story. So you use a plain frame, just the standard stuff.

Of course, this also means that your story needs to be very good. You want the editor or slush reader to find the story exciting, to be drawn into that world that you are showing them, to find the characters sitting next to them, to be drawn into that plot and fighting to overcome the conflict, to win once more... so the plain frame (the manuscript) and even the words and sentence structure just vanish as they read. That's the point. To make everything transparent, so that your story shines.

Write!
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original Posting 29 Oct 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"Ensure that your manuscript will be read and your talent has a fighting chance by making your manuscript as easy for the editor to read as possible. Pay attention to details. Before printing, make sure your ink or toner cartridge is fresh and choose a paper that will hold up to being passed around from editor to editor." Robin Gee
And you thought I had forgotten. No, simply set aside for the halloween contest postings.

The key here is simple. Make that submission as clean and ready-to-go as possible. Check the guidelines, and make your submission the way it should be. Don't play games with strange fonts, papers, or whatever -- that simply means that the editor or slush reader has a good reason for simply ignoring your work. Make the submission -- the mechanical parts, the paper, printing, and so forth -- as invisible as possible, so that the editor only sees your writing.

Now, admittedly, email submissions and such are gaining ground. But you still need to do it right! Check those guidelines -- if they say rtf, do it rtf. If they say Word, do it that way. Get the font right, the files, everything you can do to make it easy for the editor (aka slush reader) to read your work.

Sounds obvious, doesn't it? And yet, according to every editor or slush reader I've ever talked to or heard from, there are amazing things in the slush pile. Tinted papers, scented submissions, fonts never imagined by humans... and other wonders of the slush. Of course, doing that does make your submission stand out. And gets it rejected quickly.

You want slow rejections. Honest. That means someone read it.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 25 April 1994

"And of course, as everybody knows who has ever played at games, the ones that are the most fun - to lose as well as to win - are the ones that are the hardest, with the most complicated, even dangerous, tasks to accomplish. ... The artist seeks the challenge, the difficult thing to do; for his basic approach to life is not of work but of play.
...
"Life as an art and art as a game - as action for its own sake, without thought of gain or loss, praise or blame - is the key, then to the turning of life itself into a yoga, and art into the means to such a life."

Myths To Live By
Joseph Campbell

Does he mean life is like a yoyo - it has its ups and downs?

[OWC: compare life with other toys - frisbee, surfboard, whatever - in a humorous way (I would say ironic, but I can't quite pin it down:-)]
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original Posting 18 April 1994

"I remember asking him once how he could be so generous. Every theory about writing, every trick he'd discovered, he was willing to share. Wasn't he worried about revealing trade secrets? Wasn't his advice to other writers the same as aiding and abetting his professional competition? He seemed amused by the question. 'So what if someone else does well? That doesn't affect me or my work.' He felt that writing about his own experiences forced him to crystallize his thoughts and allowed him new insights that were invaluable to him."

Telling Lies for Fun and Profit by Lawrence Block (copyright 1981)
From the Introduction by Sue Grafton (copyright 1994)
William Morrow and Co.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting 26 September 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"Think about the fact that well-known authors become well-known by starting out, sending their work as new writers to publications with well-known authors. Everyone has to start somewhere. Also, even the best writers don't always create the best work -- they usually just keep at it longer and more consistently." Naomi Horii
Interesting point. Even well-known authors started out as new authors once upon a time. And as for consistency... some of the long-term authors have certainly had their ups and downs. I certainly think there are some authors whose later books needed editing.

And even in writing, there's a certain macabre truth in that notion that artists are often worth more after they are dead. The same work that wasn't worth all that much when the artist (or writer) is alive often jumps dramatically in value when there will be no more work from that brush, pen, or typewriter.

But... everyone has to start somewhere. And persistence is the name of the game, because it isn't likely to be a quick trip to the top.

So why wait? Write now, write repeatedly, and keep on writing.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 16 September 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"Send two or three clips with each query -- you don't want to bog an editor down with too many, and sending just one won't show your range." Dorothy Lehman Hoerr
Editors are busy. Don't overload them. Main points first, and cut the extra.

Hum. Obviously from the non-fiction side of the world, but... like the person who chatters on for pages in a cover letter, the point is that while you want to show your range or abilities to the editor, you are also dealing with a busy person who doesn't have time to go through everything. Don't overload them.

It's interesting, one of the regular speakers at MIT was a communications consultant who came in and gave a talk to the students. One of his key points was to remind everyone that while in school, teachers could usually be counted on to read the whole thing, no matter what -- in business, no one has to read your paper. So you have to give them a good reason to read. Just keep in mind, your reader doesn't have to read this.

Consider using newspaper style -- headline, summary of main points right up front, then the details. Especially for cover letters -- just the facts.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 10 September 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"It isn't easy to get 500 pages of manuscript down to one page for a book proposal. This can take weeks to do. Look at the cover jackets of books that are similar to yours. Write a book jacket for your manuscript -- except tell the entire story." Bob Mayer
There's that book jacket again. Imagine walking into a book store, and there's this book there... and you pick it up, and glance at the description. Wow! What a story. And you decide you just have to write that book...

Since of course, the story is yours. But what's the cover have on it? Quotes from people? Okay, what do they say? And the blurb that describes what's inside? What's it say? What about the dreaded cover picture? What is it? Fabio (isn't that the guy's name)? Or what? A sprawling canvas full of...

Go ahead. Write the book jacket. Write the book proposal. Write the publicity blurbs. Use those hints and scraps to help decide what should be in your story. And then, of course, there's the hard work... write, write, write so that the pages are there to fill in the book jacket.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 8 September 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"If you don't have a bio and clips to die for, major magazine editors aren't likely to trust you with a long feature assignment right away. Instead, aim for the short articles in the front of the magazine, and stay on the lookout for appropriate ideas you could flesh out in a few hundred words or less." Jenna Glatzer
An interesting point, even if you're thinking about writing that novel. Somehow I don't think the current trend to thick novels and extended series actually means that your first novel should be written as a 500 page brick that clearly fits inside a lengthy series. Aim at something that an editor would feel that they can take the risk on -- just an ordinary novel.

Nonfiction, and the ever shrinking magazine market... it's hard to predict right now. Do you write blog pieces and other stuff on the web and try to figure out how to eventually get paid for it? Or do you fight for a slice of the print publication pie? How about the ebook market, which is starting to grow dramatically?

I have to admit, I still think the old advice to write what you enjoy and keep writing has some advantages. If you're interested in it, it's easier to get readers interested in it. But going from writing to getting published is a very complicated and difficult step, with a lot of factors that you can't control in it.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 30 August 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"Knowing who reads the publication you're querying is crucial if you want to write for magazines. That's why many magazine writers often don't start by thinking up ideas and then looking for a magazine to suit them. Rather, they study a magazine to devise ideas appropriate to its readers." Writer's Market Companion
A different suggestion as to where to start. Rather than coming up with ideas, writing the stories or articles, and then trying to find a market, start with the market. Read the magazine, read the writer's guidelines, try to figure out what kind of readers ... what is the audience? Then write to the market.

Who reads this? What kind of stories, what kind of interests do they already have? Now can I write something that appeals to that? Or perhaps, in some cases, one decides that this magazine, this market, really is not what one wants to write, and moves on to other venues closer to one's heart?

Market research, one way or another. Do I want to write the kind of story that this magazine publishes? Then I can target that market. If I don't really want to write... zombie romances? or whatever... then perhaps I choose to avoid that market.

What do you want to write? What does the audience want to read? How much of a match (or mismatch) is there in those two pictures? Do you really want to try to convince readers that they should change their habits, or does it make better sense to look for readers that match your preferences? After all, there is nothing forcing readers to read your writing, is there? So you need to appeal to their interests, their desires...

Know your audience. Second-hand reflections in a magazine's selections are better than nothing?

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 04:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios