mbarker: (Fireworks Delight)
[personal profile] mbarker
Original Posting 2022/3/28
Here we go again! This time, Raymond turns his sights on size. How long should your scenes be? The title of chapter 3 is Size-wise: Determining Scene Length. He starts off by suggesting that beginning writers tend to make their scenes either too long or too short. Too long destroys the pace and momentum, while too short means readers can’t get involved. So…

What’s the right length? As long as the reader is paying attention and not one bit longer. Two things, the purpose of the scene and its position in the scenes, help determine the right length.

Back in chapter one, Raymond talked about the purposes of scenes. Here, we’re looking at how that affects length. Not so much word counts, as how long can you keep the reader’s attention. Attention span is the key here! Suggestions…

Go short for information dumps, scenes that explain the plot. Also, keep technical information short! Third, scenic descriptions can be short. Finally, erotic scenes should be short, unless you are deliberately trying for comedy. For all of these, imply or suggest, more than giving us every single detail ad nauseum.

Long? Conversations, especially when they reveal character. Emotional scenes, too, can be good at length. Suspense! When you keep the reader dangling, waiting, wondering…

So, that’s some suggestions or hints about length. What about positioning? Well, Raymond suggests it’s like visual arts. Contrasting elements bring out the differences, while similar elements tend to blend. So, put some contrast in to keep it interesting.

His final word, or summary, of this chapter, starts with a reminder. It’s simple. You don’t have to determine the length right away! When you start to write a scene, just write it. Then, later, you can stretch it out or trim it down to suit.

His workshop starts by pointing out that every scene has a hot spot, a moment that the scene is built around. So, he suggests, start by finding that hot spot, and draw a box around it (or highlight it, for electronic media). Then start reading backwards from there. Does that paragraph contribute to the hot spot? Underline or highlight anything that you think might not be useful. Then read the paragraph before that, and repeat. By going backwards, you get a different view of what the writing contributes to this scene, and can be more objective about trimming or changing anything that doesn’t help.

So, there you go! How long should that scene be? Well… 
Write! 
mbarker: (Me typing?)
[personal profile] mbarker
Original posting 2022/01/10
Today (Jan. 10) is Seijin no Hi in Japan. That's Coming of Age day, when they celebrate everyone who turned 20 during the last year. Which means they are legal adults.

Of course, change, life transitions, are not all celebrations. Sometimes we don't really like change, even if we may have chosen to go that way...

Over here, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/16/well/mind/managing-life-transitions.html there's an article with five suggestions for ways to deal with transitions. 1. Focus on your superpower, the part of the transition that you do best (goodbye, muddle, new beginning). 2. Identify your emotions. Fear, sadness, shame. And figure out how you want to deal with them. 3. Shed something. Fairly often, you have to toss old stuff as you move ahead. 4. Try something creative. Do something new! 5. Rewrite your life story. Find your own meaning in the middle of the life quake. Tell yourself what it means to you.

Hum. Stages of life, changes... that notion that we all go through some changes as we go through life, or as our characters go through their stories. Seems like beginnings, ends, and of course, changes like graduations, marriage, starting a job, leaving a job, having children, retiring... you know, the change points of life, these can all provide some interesting depth to your story. I mean, along with solving the mystery, catching the bad guy, finding the romantic moment, or whatever, your character also might be dealing with these little speed bumps in the highway of their life.

Okay? Something else to think about as you tackle that tale of ... well, whatever, and...
Write! 
mbarker: (ISeeYou2)
[personal profile] mbarker
Original Posting 2021/11/6
One of the tv shows here is the morning drama, 15 minutes a day. A recent episode ended with a twist, as the male main character looked at the female main character and decided that life was actually pretty good. To help drive that point home, as he looked at her, the radio in the background started playing a bit of Louis Armstrong singing On The Sunny Side of the Street. Just a few bits, and he picked up a flyer and read Louis Armstrong's name, and a few lines in English, which he translated into Japanese. A minute, maybe a bit more, and suddenly, we knew what he was thinking, and it had been reinforced by echoes of that song. Nice...  Life can be so sweet, on the sunny side of the street!

So... if you need to emphasize an emotional point or realization, think about a song that brings it out, and have your character reflect on that song. Maybe even toss in a line or verse or two. And voila... you get the benefit of background music, even without a soundtrack!

And just in case you're trying to remember that song...

Louis Armstrong - On The Sunny Side Of The Street Lyrics

Grab your coat and get your hat
Leave your worries on the doorstep
Life can be so sweet
On the sunny side of the street

Can't you hear the pitter-pat
And that happy tune is your step
Life can be complete
On the sunny side of the street

I used to walk in the shade with my blues on parade
But I'm not afraid... This rover's crossed over

If I never had a cent
I'd be rich as Rockefeller
Gold dust at my feet
On the sunny side of the street

[Instrumental]

I used to walk in the shade with them blues on parade
Now I'm not afraid... This rover has crossed over

Now if I never made one cent
I'll still be rich as Rockefeller
There will be gold dust at my feet
On the sunny 
On the sunny, sunny side of the street 
mbarker: (Burp)
[personal profile] mbarker
 Original Posting 2020/12/15

Writer's Digest, March 1991, pages 22-27, had an article talking about Clive Barker. The subtitle was "His fiction deals with the wildest ideas imaginable, yet Barker strives to maintain 'emotional realism.' Here's how he creates such dark fantasy bestsellers as The Great and Secret Show and Weaveworld."


The article starts out with a little background history of Clive Barker. Born in Liverpool in 1952, in the 70s he went to London and got involved with avant-garde theater. He was "the enfant terrible of London's fringe theater..." In the 80s, he started writing fiction, and was first published in 1984. "Horror stories laced with vivid imagery, sardonic wit and sometimes copious amounts of gore." Wild ideas rooted in a realistic framework. 


And then he tackled movies, too! Hellraiser...


"Readers know Barker for hish use of graphic sex and violence in his work." Hum... rigorous writing schedule, 8-12 hours a day. Writes in longhand! Then they drop into an interview format...


Q: When you're writing, do you first focus on the characters or the ideas?

A: The characters. Very much the characters.... Get the reader to accept one thing, one weirdness, and then the rest of it must follow realistically. ... 

Q: When the story ideas begin to get very bizarre or complex, what can you do to make sure you don't lose that sort of emotional underpinning?

A: The first thing is you've got to believe in the characters. You've got to be thinking with the characters and you've got to be in their skins. ... Any writer's belief in his or her characters -- or the situations in which the characters find themselves -- is central to his ability to convince the audience.

The second thing is that I look for parallel situations.

Q: I know you visited a prison before you wrote "In the Flesh" and I know you've watched an autopsy. Do you think that kind of firsthand research is necessary to what you do, even though your work is so involved with the imagination?

A: I think it's maybe more necessary because I'm involved with the imagination. It's very important to root your material, your fiction, in some knid fo reality. ... Solid research gives you a great place to move off from. It allows you a springboard, if you like, out into the fantastical.

Q: Have you ever had to scale back an idea or a plot line because you thought the characters were getting dwarfed by it?

A: Not really. ... Part of the pleasure of writing is taking risks. 

Q: Working on a novel that size, is there a danger of getting halfway through and thinking ... "Is this idea worth the time and emotion and everything else I'm putting into it?"

A: Absolutely. Starting wtih short fiction showed me that you can put a lot of material in 30 pages. If you are going to write 700 pages, they better be full. You better have an idea which is going to justify that length, justify the audience reading the thing for that long. ... I want a novel to be like getting a box of really great chocolates and you just have to go on to the next one and each one is different. ...

Q: Would you recommend short stories as a good place to start for people who want to write imaginative fiction?

A: ... It depends on the idea the individual's got. Short fiction lets you finish soon. A large novel means you have to pace yourself.

... I think it's very important that you try to be original, that you don't simply follow in the tracks of someone else. ... go out and do whatever makes sense to your imagination.

...

Q: What advice do you wish someone had given you when you first started to write fiction?

A: To have faith in my imagination. To not care that this wasn't 'reality.' 


Whoosh! Okay, so... let your imagination roam, and follow where it leads you!


mbarker: (Fireworks Delight)
[personal profile] mbarker
 Original Posting 9/30/2019

Just checking spam, and noticed that these might actually spark some interesting stories. Here you go, pick a number from 1 to 4 (sorry, I dump my spam regularly, I only had four collected). All prompts courtesy of ComplianceIQ, which seems to think I need training a lot...1. How to survive an Emotionally Toxic Workplace. Feel free to make the workplace, home, or whatever location you prefer emotionally or literally toxic. Add characters trying to survive, and... WRITE!2. Inspiring Leadership Through Conflict, Courage, and Creativity: The Art of "Passion Power" Hoho! Take a dash of conflict, a heaping spoonful of courage, and a pinch of creativity. Stir well, and let the passions play in your story! Inspired leadership, or just perspiring? Up to you...3. Assertive Training for Executives, Managers, and Supervisors. Because they don't know how to be assertive enough? How about assertiveness for the rest of us? Feel free to portray the havoc as someone starts being assertive, and the rest of the world reacts.4. How to Create a Drama Free Workplace! No Drama Queens here! Or maybe you want to flip it, and consider how to add drama to the workplace? After all, we could use some background music, sound effects, applause, maybe a laugh track...Sorry, just an oddball exercise. Hope it works for some of you.tink
mbarker: (BrainUnderRepair)
[personal profile] mbarker
Original Posting 8/9/2019

Okay. Let's start with a simple roll of the dice. Eight-sided, now! So, here's what you chose!1. Fear: a feeling of being afraid, frightened, scared.2. Anger: feeling angry. A stronger word for anger is rage.3. Sadness: feeling sad. Other words are sorrow, grief.4. Joy: feeling happy. Other words are happiness, gladness.5. Disgust: feeling something is wrong or nasty. Strong disapproval.6. Surprise: being unprepared for something.7. Trust: a positive emotion. Admiration is stronger, acceptance is weaker.8. Anticipation: looking forward positively to something that is going to happen.>From https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_emotions#Robert_Plutchik's_theoryThey also have this cool wheel, very colorful, with lots of emotions. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_emotions#/media/File:Plutchik-wheel.svgAha! The leaves of the flower in the wheel are the eight from the list. So the pairs are actually1. Joy versus sadness2. Trust versus disgust3. Fear versus anger4. Surprise versus anticipationOkay...Anyway, roll your eight sided dice or simply pick a number from 1 to 8.Incidentally, if you don't have an eight-sided dice handy, you can also go to this link https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VUc0WqhGjbca-0s5k-eQJogo8-Ep-XdCqhcFfgrv5A8Each time you open it, you will get a new selected emotion. Or you can press CTRL-R and the spreadsheet will randomly pick another one.Now take that emotion, and do the method acting trick. Think about a time in your life when you have experienced that emotion. What caused it? What did you feel? How did your body react? What did you want to do to express that emotion?Now, let's consider making a scene where a character is experiencing that emotion. Go ahead, convert your experience into a scene. What happens to make the character experience the emotion? Who else is in the scene? What does the character say, do, how do they act while they feel that emotion? And then...Mostly, for this exercise, just write that snippet, that little scene, with one character experiencing an emotion. You can use the strong version, the middle version, or the weak version of the emotion, whichever one works best for you. But make sure that when your reader reads that scene, they can recognize that emotion. You probably don't want to come right out and say Joe was scared, but... What shows us that Joe is terrified? What makes us feel that terror? Or whichever emotion you picked.There you go. One emotion, one scene, one character. Now, spin that colorful wheel of emotions again! If you really want a hard exercise, take two random emotions, and show us the scene where the character experiences the first one, and then something happens and transforms it into the second one. Go ahead, I dare you. I double dare you!
mbarker: (BrainUnderRepair)
[personal profile] mbarker
 Original Posting April 16, 2019

I'm sure you all remember Q in the James Bond movies, who carefully handed Bond some gadgets and told him not to play with them. Why? Well, at the end, Bond often escaped the doom descending on him using those gadgets. But, if he had just pulled them out of his socks at that point, we would all groan. However, Q handed them out way ahead of time. So…"In fiction, the Lead character reaches a point near the end when everything looks lost. Lights Out! What he needs is courage and motivation for the Final Battle. This is where the Q Factor comes in."The Q Factor is an emotional push, set up back in Act I, that provides inspiration or instruction at a critical moment in Act III. Sometimes it's an icon or a physical object. Sometimes it's just a memory, a voice in the head. Sometimes it's something that just reminds the Lead about… It's something that encourages the Lead. Sometimes it's a negative example, where the Lead thinks something like, "If I give up, I'll be as bad as…"Why is this here? Remember the death stakes. When you face death, you are afraid! When all that stands in front of the Lead, he's going to be tempted to run. What makes him stay and fight?The Q Factor, an emotional boost, just when it's needed.So, how do you figure it out? Well, James suggests brainstorming Q factors! Make a list of physical items, mentors, characters embodying cowardice and moral corruption. Then, choose one that you like. Write a scene early in Act I that ties this element emotionally to the Lead. You may want to put a reminder in Act II. Oh, you might have The Q Factor before or after Lights Out.James finishes with a reminder. The story is about a character using force of will to fight death. That's not just analytical. It's emotion that moves the main character to action, and The Q Factor is a spark for that fire.So. Doorway of No Return #2 slams behind us. Mounting Forces gather for the Final Battle ahead of us. Lights Out as we face the Final Battle. And... the Q Factor gives us a glimmer of hope, a beacon to guide us, a song to sing as we head into battle!
mbarker: (BrainUnderRepair)
[personal profile] mbarker
 Original Posting Jan. 11, 2019

All right. One more warming up piece, before we dive into the structure. See, James points out that many people seem to think using a structure is going to suck the emotion right out of the writing, and... that’s wrong. As James sees it, first you get the emotions in the writer, then in the characters (and writing). So, how do we get the emotion with the structure?

Well, he suggests a paradigm from golf. See it, feel it, trust it!

See it? Visualize it first, in your head.

Feel it? Let yourself do it.

Trust it? That’s the part where you pull back the internal editor and trust that you are doing it right. Later, afterwards (or should that be afterwords?) you can check for mistakes and mechanics, and fix things up. But right now, write!

So. See it. In your head, on the stage (movie screen, tv screen, 3d virtual reality... whatever your internal stage looks like), set it up and let it unfold. Can you feel what the characters are going through?

Feel it! James suggests that music may help you to get the beat and feel it. A playlist? Sure...

Trust it. Write! Let the feeling fill you and roll out in the words. If you need to, stop for five minutes and brainstorm the emotions and thoughts of your POV character. Then let those emotions rip! Overwrite, if anything.

Now go back and fix it up. Revision is when you check the emotional structure and tighten it up, if you need to.

Ask yourself James’s five questions about the emotions in the scene:

1. Does it feel right?
2. Is it consistent with the character?
3. Does it reveal a new side of the character?
4. Does it enhance the scene?
5. Does it contribute to the overall plot?

You may want to consider the various ways to render emotion.

1. You can name it. This is usually best used sparingly, and in low-intensity parts.
2. Show it in action.
3. Show it in physical reaction.
4. Show it in internal thoughts.
5. Show it in dialogue.

Mix and match to suit your writing, your style, your characters, your scenes...

Whoosh! So, with death, brainstorming, keeping creativity going while you write, scenes, and emotional backlighting, we are ready to dive into the structure, and... write!

And away we go! 14 signposts of Super Structure next!


mbarker: (Me typing?)
[personal profile] mbarker
Original Posting Dec. 30, 2017

Writer's Digest, January 1994, had an article by Nancy Kress on pages eight, 10, 11, with the title, "Is It Good?" The subtitle was, "That depends on who's doing the judging – and on these four criteria."

Nancy starts out by pointing out that it's a really good story, her book wasn't very good, he's a good writer, and similar judgments all have that word in them: Good. Just what do we mean by that? Why does one person thinks something is good all another person thinks it's mediocre or even worse? What, if anything, ties being good and being published? For that matter, how do you judge if your work or somebody else's is good? Well…

Nancy suggests that there are various definitions. You need to be aware of at least a few of the major ones. For example:

Judging by texture. "This is the literary criterion for judging fiction." Texture? Well, it's hard to define, but not too hard to recognize. Prose with a high level of detail. Details that create an interlocking set of symbols that conveys meaning, related to the voice. Usually, the details, symbols, and all that is used to explore subtlety of characters. Details, emotional reactions, motifs, voice…

Or maybe judging by plot! Yes, some people don't care about texture. Instead, they want a fast-moving plot, plenty of incidents, unexpected developments, danger, overt conflict. Excitement, action! This actually tends to be the commercial definition, because these books sell a lot of copies. They may or may not have interesting texture and well drawn characters. But what people are looking for is the action! Action, fast pace, danger, lives at stake, a clear-cut resolution to plot complications, and characters that your readers can root for.

Or, judging by scope? Within the realm of commercial, plot-driven fiction, some are better than others. What's the difference? Nancy says it's scope. The background, carefully researched, and portrayed. "It's about an entire era: its hopes, ambitions, briefs, fears, selfishnesses, heroisms." Scope and depth! "Genre work transcends its genre by aiming for – and achieving – a complex setting that takes on a life of its own."

Or perhaps, judging by emotional response? Bland texture, tired plots, stock characters, little scope – but still a bestseller? Well, "such books fill an emotional need. They reaffirmed for readers whatever they already believe or want to believe…" Emotional reassurance and hope. Romances that let them feel love, war stories that let them feel victorious, adventure tales and let them feel tough, and so forth. The readers get something they value, and they consider such books good.

So, texture, plot, scope, emotional response? If someone says your work is or is not good, try probing a little bit to find out which value system they are using.

"Finally, some stories have it all. Textured, individual prose. Compelling plot. Complex characters. Scope of background. Timely emotional satisfaction. We call these books classics."

Understand the criteria which you are using, and which other people are using to evaluate your fiction. Then decide whether you're going the right direction.

And have a good time writing!

Practice? Well, I suppose you could take your work in progress or maybe some of your favorites, and tried judging them by the various criteria that Nancy has described. Does it have great texture? How about the plot? Scope? Or is it provoking an emotional response? You might even consider trying to modify your work to push one or more of these little bit higher!

Just write!
mbarker: (Me typing?)
[personal profile] mbarker
Original Posting Aug. 23, 2017

Writer's Digest, February 2001, pages 28, 29, and 35, have an article by Joan Mazza with the title Finding Your Heart. The idea is that some of the stock rejections – not enough weight, too slight, lacks power – really mean that it's lacking emotional honesty, strong feelings. "Editors want a manuscript to arrive at a depth of emotional honesty that most beginning writers avoid. Beginners back away from strong feelings of all kinds. They are reluctant to have their characters suffer."

Avoiding pain-and-suffering is completely understandable. It's normal. But… "Facing and exposing these emotional upsets is what is meant by the old writerly adage open a vein." You need strong emotions, powerful feelings, all of that. "Tiptoeing away from the emotional punch of a story makes it bland and superficial."

One reason may be simply maintaining our own self-image. We don't want other people to think we're that kind of a person! "Worrying about what others might think will give you writer's block every time.… The distressing and difficult aspects of being human are exactly the parts of the story that people want to hear."

We read to explore experiences we might never have, to see the entire spectrum of emotions, to live other lives from the inside.

Joan points out that you start whispering, people around you stop talking so that they can hear. "In a way, a whisper is like a narrative hook: it gets the reader's attention." But… If you've promised strong emotions and then you don't deliver, your audience evaporates. Frankly, you have to lay bare the innermost emotions. "A willingness to be publicly honest and vulnerable is also what makes readers love authors enough to call themselves fans."

Take a look at what really is emotionally charged for you. What are the memories that you don't talk about, or the ones that you twist when you let someone know about them? What are your fears and worries? Illness, death, abandonment, failure, ridicule? Make up a short list of the things that really make you jump. Then… Start writing about them. Look at your nightmares, your daydreams, your memories.

"Enter the cavern of your most distressing sentiments on memories, then put them on the page. Your writing will be more compelling, as well as more marketable."

There's a tiny little sidebar in the middle of the second page. "Finding your emotional truth. Ask yourself these questions:
– What terrifies me?
– What disgusts me?
– What news stories make me wince or change the channel?
– What is my biggest secret(s)?
– What would I never do?

In your answers to these questions, you will find the seeds of your most powerful writing in all genres.

If this pushes any of your buttons, good! Go write."

Oho! So, emotional depth. And Joan suggests quite a few questions and probes to help us get started. But... let's see. Practice? Okay, take something you've written recently, and think about the emotions in it. Did you pull back at some point? Did you avoid really putting your character through the wringer, because you didn't want to have to suffer through that experience yourself? Are there emotional depths that you can dredge a little deeper, things that make your nightmares and memories twinge? Go ahead, add that emotional edge and see what the story does with it.

Write?
tink


mbarker: (Burp)
[personal profile] mbarker
Original Posting Feb. 1, 2017

Writers Digest, March 2001, had an article on pages 32, 33, and 51, by Steven James with the title, "Put Punch on the Page." Basically it's about converting oral stories to written stories. I'm sure most of us have a personal story, a joke, an anecdote, some kind of a story that we tell people. However, when we go to write it down, somehow it just fizzles. So Steven lays out a way to go from the story we tell to the story we write.

1. Record your ideas. Brain dumping! Just get it out there on paper. Write it the way you tell it. Don't mess with it. And then take a look at what's missing.

2. Restructure your story. Find the hook, or as Steven prefers to call it, the gaff. Grab their attention. Start with action, energy, emotion, suspense, something to make the reader want to keep going. Hold off on the background and other stuff.

3. Reshape your story. Oral language tends to be immediate and informal. But now you're going for more complete sentences. Dialogue, keep it short and snappy, interruptions and all. Descriptive and narrative parts? Here you want sentences with detail, complexity, link. Be precise, make it good readable text.

4. Reveal your emotions. You've got emotion or an idea that you want to express. Show the reader through action and reaction what is happening. Remember, readers can't see your expression, so you have to give them the written hints. When you tell it, how do you convey the emotions, what do you do or say? Now, how do you translate that into text. You want the feeling and the mood, not just the same words, but through the story.

5. Reduce the confusion. Telling a story, we separate characters through inflection and expressions. Writing dialogue, you've got to add speaker tags. You may need to add new dialogue, additional transitions, details and descriptions. Don't get carried away, but do create images.

6. Remember the audience. Make sure your story is clear for the audience. Get someone else to read it, and give you a honest opinion about how it flows. Are there gaps, unanswered questions, unclear transitions? Now, reread it, and revise it until it's as exciting as the oral version was.

Incidentally, page 33 includes a "creativity starter." It's almost an exercise! So, put your writing hats on, and try this:

1. Select a personal anecdote you enjoy telling friends. Write it down.
2. Add structure. Is there extra background you should eliminate? Try making a brief outline of the story.
3. Review that outline. Do you need to revise some of the sentences so they work better together? Rewrite!
4. Add texture. Is there information about the characters or the setting that you can add to make this a richer story?
5. Check the transitions. What about those adjectives and adverbs? Can you drop some, make some more specific, or otherwise tweak them to help the story read smoothly?
6. Think about the audience. Who do you want to read this? What are they likely to have trouble understanding? How can you clarify? Go ahead, clean up your story and make it read like the wonder it is!

There you go! An anecdote, a personal story, turned into words!
tink
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original Posting 3 March 2011

Aha! Over here http://johndbrown.com/writers/ John Brown offers some observations about writing. Now, I'm going to skip down the page (we'll come back to suspense later... maybe! :-) to the part about 3 Things You Must Learn to Write Killer Stories. And...

Let's take a look at Lesson 1 under Thing 1. Thing 1 is What Stories Do. Good thing to know, eh? And Lesson 1 is Lipstick! Yes, John uses lipstick to reveal the first mystery underlying killer stories. You see, if you just look at the ingredients in lipstick... oh, my. Wax, fats, emollients, pigments... not terribly appetizing. And if you asked an alien to make some up from that list, well, you might not appreciate the results. What's missing? Ah, what do we do with lipstick? Well... he uses a picture of a woman with lipstick on her lips to point out that we (at least some of us) feel something when we look at that picture. Lipstick (in the right place)  makes us FEEL something!

Guess what. Lipstick creates emotion. Stories? Well, yes.

He suggests a simple exercise. Make a list of say five of your favorite stories. Novels, movies, cartoons, whatever, what sticks in your mind?

Then, look at that list. What do you love about them? What do they do that makes you enjoy them?

Make you laugh, make you cry, make you feel emotions!

What do you think? Is John onto something here?

Want to take a look at Lesson 2? Coming soon...
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original Posting 27 Dec 2010

Hum...

Over here http://www.sfnovelists.com/2010/12/23/you-cant-teach-passion/, David B. Coe blogged about "You Can't Teach Passion." And...

For some reason, the title, "You Can't Teach Passion," kind of itched whenever I saw it. So I've been thinking about why that feels like fingernails on a blackboard to me.

I think I can probably agree with David that we can't teach passion, if we're talking about teaching as "sage on the stage" lecture presentations designed to fill time with the teacher talking and the students scribbling, sleeping, or staring into space, but probably not really engaged. Unfortunately, too many of us have learned to define teaching and learning in those terms.

On the other hand, that kind of teaching often does a very good job of eliminating passion. Even someone who has a dream, a vision, a fire burning often finds that kind of teaching acting as a tremendously effective dream quencher, blackout curtain, and fire extinguisher. Take a kid who's lively, outgoing, interested in the world around them, set them down in a orderly classroom with good teaching discipline, and pretty soon you're likely to have a quiet drone.

But, despite the excellent methods of eliminating passion that we have developed (documented at length as killer phrases in What a Great Idea! 2.0 by Chic Thompson -- that's nonsense, that's irrelevant, that's unproven, that's dangerous, that's not salable, etc. etc. etc. all of which say "No" to passion), we've also got some ways to encourage passion. See Michalko's Thinkertoys, Roger van Oech's A Whack on the Back of the Head and A Kick In the Seat of the Pants, or Edward de Bono's various books, among others. Ways to take that little flicker of interest and excitement, to blow gently on it and provide tinder to help it grow into a raging flame. To give passion creative outlets and let the dream become reality.

You can't teach passion. But you can quench it, so easily. And, on the gripping hand, you can encourage passion. Heck, you might even find a teacher cheering you on. And that's real learning.

(Who is still trying to figure out why the notion that some people don't have "the passion" or "the inspiration" or whatever it is makes me queasy. What do you think?)
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 8 May 2009

Writers' Digest, October 2004, pages 26 to 33, has a collection of short "nuggets of wisdom" related to getting published. Maria Schneider is the author of the compilation. Take a deep breath, and here we go:
"The author, through her characters, must speak to her readers human to human, with all the tears and joy real people experience." G. Miki Hayden
All the world's a stage... and the writer has more than one character to set on their stage! What do you think -- do you think about writing as a dialogue, as talking to your readers, as helping them see and feel tears and joy, up close and personal?

It's only a paper moon? But it sheds such a nice light on our affairs?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original Posting 25 February 2009

Getting the Pace Right

Writer's Digest, March 2006, The Writing Clinic by Paul Bagdon on pages 52 to 55, discusses how using pacing and a simple structure produces "Exquisite Dread." It's looking at a prologue, "a resoundingly splendid piece of work -- so strong and evocative, in fact, that it's a positive example of the principles of effective fiction writing. Beck has done almost everything right in her pages, and her first paragraph constitutes an essentially flawless opening for a novel or a short story."

Now that's a high recommendation. So what's the first paragraph look like? Glad you asked:

"Margaret Costello prepared Abby's after-school snack before she hanged herself in the garage. She sliced the cheddar into perfect squares and arranged them on a plate, alternating crackers and cheese in two straight lines. She readied a meatloaf, then placed the heating instructions next to the cheese plate on the kitchen table and walked through the house one last time."

The commentary has three points.

1. Open with action. Opening paragraphs need to create drama, and make it almost impossible for the reader to stop. There a lot of ways to do this, but "open with action" is a good recommendation. But what does action mean? The very first line of this paragraph provides action -- the very ordinary preparation of a snack juxtaposed with the revelation that the protagonist intends to kill herself. And then we continue with the snack.

From the first sentence, the reader knows what is going to happen to Margaret. So why do they keep reading? It's a combination of interest and empathy. "It's difficult to imagine a reader who wouldn't be compelled to continue reading after absorbing the opening paragraph -- which is precisely the effect a well-crafted opening is intended to have."

2. Pace yourself. How quickly the plot is developed and the characters are revealed is what really keeps the reader going. You can use flashbacks, changes in person and tense, changes in location, different narrators, and even straightforward simple chronological description. The key is keeping the pacing in mind. Is the plot dragging because of description? Is it racing too quickly, so that the reader doesn't have a chance to keep up? Are we flashing all over the place on non sequiturs? Don't bury a vivid plot in overused devices. Technique is at the service of telling the story, not the other way around.

3. Emotion or sensationalism? Sometimes writers use emotion to strengthen scenes that aren't quite as strong as it should be -- that's sensationalism. Be careful of going over the line. You want honest accurate emotions, not melodrama. This particular prologue is emotionally difficult. But it is also compelling and not overdone.

So when you're doing those beginnings, remember this example. Juxtapose a revealed action with the ordinary. Don't bury strong plot in writing devices. And portray honest emotions.

And write.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 13 June 2008

Conferences and travel sometimes have odd insights.

The hotel I was at earlier this week left four Dove promises in the room every day. Along with exhortations to send real mail, not an email (and just what is false or unreal about email? Why is paper more real than expression in the digital realm? But I digress...) a couple caught my eye.
Sometimes one smile means more than a dozen roses.

When two hearts race, they both win.
Aren't those nice, and poignant?

Could always play twist that phrase or the ever popular "clothe that saying in characters, a plot, and a scene."

Or just write :-)

When we write, we set dreams free and sometimes help hearts pitter patter.

(I have miles of messages to go -- and jetlag to conquer -- before I  rest? Robert Frost for the Digital Decades?)
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 18 Feb 2008

[Just an article in the flood of papers - but I thought I'd pass along the central notion to y'all. Hope you enjoy it.]

Find The Passion by James Scott Bell in Writer's Digest, November 2004, pages 24 to 27 talks about how to put emotional power into your writing. He suggests five steps:
1. Feeling authentic emotions
2. Playing with the possibilities those emotions create
3. Planning
4. Writing
5. Editing
So we start by finding the emotion. Pick the tone that you want, the emotional feeling, and then into your own emotional memories. Actors put themselves in the characters place and then imagine what they would be feeling. Remember when you felt the emotion. Remember what you saw, heard, smelled, touched, tasted -- what you felt! Other people use music to remind them of feelings. Get in touch with that emotion.

Next, we improvise. "In the theater of the mind, we learn to let scenes and characters play around; we keep things hopping in new and interesting ways just by giving our imaginations free reign." (p. 26) Take a character, and imagine them in a scene in your mind. What does the character do? How do they move, what are they wearing, how do they act and react? Where are they going and why? Now put in some opposition, another character, or a problem of some sort? Watch the scene unfold and feel the emotions, the struggle, the fight. Find the passion. Bell talks about the imaginary movie that we run in our own head.

Oh, and keep track of images or scenes that your imagination tosses up at odd times. I woke to the phrase "getting up on the wrong side of the Bard" today. I have no real idea what that phrase had to do with anything, but I wrote it in my journal and expect that sometime it may expand. Especially if you get images, take the time to write them down.

Third, we're going to plan the scenes. Analyze the results of the brainstorms and improvisation, and put it in working order. Remind yourself of the emotional tone that you want to achieve. Think about whether the scene you're working on will be mostly action or mostly reflection. Should the stakes be high or low? Are the characters working at the top of their game or are they recovering from a major scene? And make sure that the end of the scene makes the reader desperate to turn the page and keep reading. One hint: you don't have to resolve everything. Leave the reader wondering!

Fourth, write the first draft. Write your heart out. Many writers recommend writing the first draft passionately and quickly. Put the inner critic away and just let the words flow.

Fifth, finish the job. Clean up the draft. Cut out the big, stupid mistakes. You may be cutting entire sections, but that's okay. Then clean up the details. Refine the cliches, tighten up the wording, make those diamonds that you wrote sparkle.

"Great fiction is formed by heat. Feel your characters and plots intensely, write in the heat of passion, then cut judiciously." (p. 27)

When we write, we learn about ourselves.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Thu, 13 May 1993 18:32:01 JST

Chatter, divergent discussions, flames, and other topics are endemic to this list, and often result in harsh exhortations to focus on writing or flurries of gentle reminders (depending on who notices that we've wandered afield again and how they respond to such wandering). However, on consideration, I think both the harsh "writing, the whole writing, and nothing but the writing" and the gentler urges are mistaken.

First, almost a non sequitur, the chatter and lively reactions on this list can provide any good writer with indications of interests that may be found among larger segments of the writer's prospective audience. For example, knowing that this group responds positively to nostalgic recollections of comics, certain older movies, or other bits and pieces provides the writer with cheap "audience testing" that such responses are likely to be found in the larger audience.

However, let us ignore that, since there are other sources of such information, including the general FAQs and such from netnews. Still, there is an important role for the back-and-forth "small talk" often seen in this group. That role lies in exciting and refining the reactions of the writer, who will find that the emotional involvement practiced here will pay off when constructing fiction. And this is the problem with those who try to "douse" the flames before they have reached a conclusion, because whether we feel comfortable or not (I don't enjoy conflict) there is a certain sense in which we can only become "powerful" writers if we are moved to our depths about the issues we are writing about, and that is much more likely to happen if those depths have been opened up, irritated, and aggravated as much as possible in "friendly" fighting here on the list.

I.e., the depth of apathy lies in the lack of reaction, and in that apathy there is no oil for the writer's lamp. Writers strike paydirt when they look inside at precisely those points which cause emotional, hot reactions - and must learn to see more than one side to those grounds, to realize that the protagonist and antagonist are struggling within their very soul. I don't know a better way to find these points or to develop them than through exactly the kind of chatter and diversions that are frequently castigated on this list as being "off-subject."

Perhaps it is my own confusion, but the lists of hints, the critiquing and other activities can be found elsewhere, in purer form. The rumbling flow of point and counterpoint is rarer, and harder to replace.

Again, let me suggest that while the chatter and reactions of the list provides you with some suggestions as to interests of your audience, its most important function is in driving your reactions, in provoking, teasing, angering, even boring you. For in those reactions you can begin to measure yourself, to calibrate the instrument you play within all of your writing, to tune yourself to the current jazz and jive, in short, to come alive.

Your writing will benefit.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Chapter 23: Your Protagonist's Emotional Thread

Wrapping up the last pieces of Make a Scene by Jordan Rosenfeld, this chapter looks at the transformation of the character really across the scenes. Most narratives include some growth or change in the character, which really adds meaning and depth. This emotional thread cuts across the individual scenes, and Rosenfeld has some comments about it.

First, of course, is the point that changes in personality -- in beliefs, attitudes, and so forth -- shouldn't be sudden or easy. People don't change without a struggle. To make it feel authentic, to give credibility to each scene, you need to make sure that the change is motivated, and probably somewhat gradual.

In the early scenes, we're establishing everything. Characters, conflicts, problems, etc. Right up front, you can include character-related plot threads:
  • Involvement. How is the protagonist related to the significant situation? Is it his fault, centered on him somehow? Is he integral to it or does he stumble into it?
  • Stakes. What does the protagonist gain or lose because of events?
  • Desires. What does the protagonist want?
  • Fears. What scares the protagonist?
  • Motivation. Why does the protagonist do things?
  • Challenges. How does the significant situation challenge the protagonist?
At the end of the early scenes, you as author can ask yourself if the protagonist is shaky enough? Are there enough problems and conflicts that readers will be worried? Is the protagonist directly involved in a significant situation? Does the protagonist seem to be struggling, trying to act, being forced to change? Is there enough uncertainty -- readers should be trying to figure out what will happen, not betting on a sure thing.

Scenes in the middle make the reader and the protagonists work. This is where the protagonist gets tested and stretched. These scenes need to include:
  • opportunities for crisis and conflict. Makes things harder, more complicated, add problems on top of the problems.
  • opportunities for dramatic and surprising changes. Given the pressures and complications, the protagonist can start acting differently, perhaps in anger, perhaps in achieving more than seemed possible.
  • opportunities for plot complications. Things were bad before, now they're going to get horrible. New complications and new complexity.
  • opportunities to test drive new behaviors. Emotional reactions can start to pop under the pressure and stress. The protagonist can surprise us.
  • opportunities for dramatic tension. Put the protagonist in danger, emotional or physical, and build an aura of tension -- tighten the suspense.
Desperation, uncertainty, trials and tribulations. Some protagonists get worse before they get better. That's okay. This is the part where the character shows how they really behave when things get hot and tough. The protagonist learns who their real friends are and what their own strengths and weaknesses really are, all in preparation for the final scenes.

The final scenes are where all of the changes get wrapped up. This is where we show who is left after the climax -- who has the protagonist become? So you need to know:
  • what are the consequences of having desires met?
  • what are the consequences of having fears realized?
  • did what the protagonist wants change? What is it now?
  • did what the protagonist fears change?
  • how does the protagonist view the significant situation now?
This is where you demonstrate character change. You need to show through action or dialogue what has changed. You also need to answer any plot questions that are left. Tie up the major consequences. In most cases, this includes showing:
  • the protagonist has learned something
  • the protagonist's attitudes and behavior have changed
  • the protagonist has started a new journey or direction
"The key to successful character transformation is to let your character changes unfold dramatically but also realistically. Let the reader see your characters change by how they act and speak, and by the choices they make within the framework of scenes, not through narrative summaries."

That's what Rosenfeld says about the emotional threads in the plot.

What shall we add? Well, how about taking a look at a story or novel that you like, and consider the growth of the protagonist? Even in a thriller or action story, we're likely to find that the protagonist learns something, changes, faces up to their fears and beats them down, etc. So start at the beginning, and track that golden thread of the protagonist's emotional fabric, beliefs, etc. How is it set up in the beginning? What happens to it in the middle? And at the climax, how does the writer handle it? Normally there is a definite shift from the well-worn emotions at the beginning through tearing and holes in the middle into a restructuring and rebuilding at the end. Something like that, anyway. How does it work in the stories you like?

Then, turn around and consider a story or novel that you are working on. Do you show the readers the emotions, the beliefs and attitudes of your protagonist? In the beginning, do you let them know how the hero feels, and where the flaw is? What about in the middle? Do you keep that thread going? And in the climax and ending, do you show how the person has grown and changed? You don't have to spend pages in internal turmoil and debate, but make sure that the reader feels for the protagonist.

S'aright?

How about a third one? Okay, let's start with picking two numbers from one to 12. Two different numbers, okay? You may roll two pair of dice if you like. Got your numbers? Now find them in this list:
1.  sadness  2. distress  3.  relief  4.  joy
5.  hate  6. love 7.  fear  8. anticipation
9.  anger  10.  guilt  11.  gratitude  12. pride
What you have there is two emotions. Maybe sadness and guilt. And here's the exercise. Consider how you might show a reader that the protagonist feels sadness, right at the start of a story. And then consider how you might show a reader that they feel guilt -- at the end of a tale. And for bonus points, consider how sadness transforms into guilt. Now can you put that together into a story? From sadness over his parents' death to a lurking sense of guilt? Or . . .

Get those writing neurons crackling, and write.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 07:27:44 -0400

As the words run around the world, we find...

The Japan Times, 7/21, p. 17
Nourishing One's Own Inner Source of Joy by Toshimi Horiuchi

"One's inner sun is also a major source of joy.  When well cultivated, this sun's spirit pervades one's entire inner world not unlike the haunting loveliness that surrounds myrtle in full bloom, or the delicate crystallization of earth-stones into gems.  In either case, joy is created.  One's inner sun is a joymaker."

<skip a little -- and wonder just which one is myrtle?>

"It is well, then, to put this inner sun to work not only producing gems of joy for oneself but gems of joy to share with others.  When the soul sings out its joy, its echo is heard in the hearts of others like heaven's rays reflected upon a stream of water running through a grassy meadow."

<and the gentle stream rolls on...>

"So as we touch or 'kiss' a gem of joy, a thrill rises up from within because of the very mysteriousness of the event, like a star throbbing in heaven's deepest repose.  When a gem of joy resounds in the depth of the soul, we 'hear' a polished song like the song of the eastern sky embracing the purest dawn.  When we 'see' a gem of joy glittering in the heart of the soul, our spirit sparkles like the western sky reflecting the colors of the setting."

<tumbling synesthesia smooths the edges of our minds to...>

"In this way we infinitely elevate the quality of joy.  We rouse bright waves on the flat surface of life, creating chain reactions that attract and prolong the waves of joy."

Rouse bright waves on the flat surface of life...

Create chain reactions that attract and prolong the waves of joy...

Think about your writing (poesy, short storettes, the occasional friction, perhaps even a dash of non-fiction and light?).  How do you rouse bright waves in your writing?  Have you ever created a chain reaction that attracted and prolonged waves of joy?  What about those gems of joy -- have you seen them in others' writings?  Collected and shared them with others, to see the delight they find in those same facets?  Have you polished and cut the edges of your own gems of joy, kissing them, resounding with their song, sparkling and glittering with all the colors of the sunset?

How do you dig for these gems in yourself?  Where do you find the supersaturated solution that crystallizes around the fragmentary thought, how do you shape and finish your gems, what settings do you use, how do you choose to display the joys?

Tell us about the games that you play with your gems, found, borrowed, or honestly expressed from your own being...

In short (or in long!)...
write?

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 07:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios