mbarker: (BrainUnderRepair)
[personal profile] mbarker
Original Posting Dec. 5, 2017

Writer's Digest, February 1994, had a two page article on pages 38 and 39 focusing on what to do when your editor says cut. "I want 25,000 words cut from your manuscript. When can I see a revision?" Yipes!

So, start out by separating thematic (content) and mechanical (text) editing. Then…

Thematic chops

1. Get into the story right away. In medias res? You know, get to the good stuff!
2. Chop character development. Secondary, minor – cut the lengthy characterization, but keep a essential action.
3. Pare character background. Will readers still know what's going on without this background? Will the plots suffer? Cut the extra.
4. Delete characters. Are there extra characters who don't play pivotal roles? Can you combine them with other characters?
5. Cut multiple motivations. If more than one motivation drives the same outcome, get rid of the extras.
6. Simplify atmosphere characters. Yes, waiters, taxi drivers and so forth are wonderful, but… Focus on the main guys.
7. Cut linking scenes. That walk along the river to get from one scene to another – use the movie camera cut, and just jump the transition.
8. Rely on the present. What's happening now is more important than the past. Get rid of the old.
9. Simplify writerly touches. Excess foreshadowing, contrasts, allusions, comparisons, imagery. Necessary description, but not purple prose.
10. Pare interrelated scenes. The same scene from different viewpoints, narrative scenes about a secondary storyline, try cutting it.
11. Cut action. If the dialogue is the most important part, cut down on the description of action.
12. Delete secondary storylines. Yes, they make the story richer – and longer!

Mechanical chops

1. Cut the "he saids" and "she thoughts." If there's only one or two characters, or they have unique styles, you may not need dialogue tags. Try it without them. The same for interior monologues -- we probably know who is thinking, right?
2. Line edit. Rephrase, rewrite, active tense.
3. Delete extra adjectives and adverbs.

All right? Start with the high level structural changes. Then get down to line-by-line tightening. See how many words you can take out!
mbarker: (BrainUnderRepair)
[personal profile] mbarker
Original Posting July 14, 2017

Revision! Just how do you tackle that? Well, Writer's Digest, April 2000, on pages 30-33, as an article by Raymond Obstfeld with the title "A Four-Step Plan." And indeed, Raymond lays out four steps to doing revision. I'm just going to grab the headings from each section, and maybe a little bit of the discussion. If you're interested, look up the article!

Now, Raymond recommends two key things. First, compartmentalize the approach – do it in four steps, and focus on only fixing that thing while you're doing that step. Second, he doesn't suggest revising the whole thing in one great big swoop. Instead, he recommends tackling short, self-contained sections – scenes or chapters. Unlike many, he actually discourages writing the whole draft and then starting to revise. Instead, he likes to do short pieces and revise them. Your mileage may vary?

Step one: Structure

Goal: Develop a clear and compelling plot.
Look for: too passive, talking head characters; no plot buildup/anti-climactic action.
How to fix: basically, you're looking to see that the events are in the right order, and that if they are, the scenes build toward a satisfying climactic payoff.

Talking heads happens when nothing's going on – make the scene more active. Every scene should have a beginning, middle, and end! Conflict, complications, and resolution. Now, you may also need to revise the overall structure. Easiest is to create notecards for each scene or chapter, who is in the scene, what happens, how big is it? Then look at the notecards, move them around, add or subtract as needed.

Step two: Texture

Goal: Sharpen descriptive passages to make characters, setting, and action more vivid.
Look for: too much or too little description, research info dump, too many adjectives, info in the wrong place.
How to fix: this step has a lot to do with defining your own style.

How much description? If there's so much that it bogs down, you need to cut. If there's so little that we can't imagine the characters or settings, you need more. Poetic, wonderful stuff that makes you admire the author – probably cut, maybe use later? Watch for word choice, and use strong, rich, evocative terms. Imagine adjectives are $100 bills – don't waste them.

Step three: Dialogue

Goal: Elicit character personality through conversation.
Look for: Too many taglines, too few taglines, taglines in the wrong place, bland or melodramatic lines.
How to fix: Taglines are the "he said" and "she said" parts of dialogue. When there are only two speakers, several lines can go on without telling us who the speaker is. The reader already knows. [Also, the dialogue should be identifiable!]

Make the character voices individual, cadence, tone! Try rearranging where you put the taglines, and vary your use of speech tags and action tags. Keep your tags simple.

Step four: Editing

Goal: Tighten pace and continuity.
Look for: Repetition through implication, slow passages.
How to fix: Cut. Cut. Cut.

Cut. And then make sure your transitions are clear.

Go through all four steps. Now, are you comfortable sending it or publishing it? If not, start again. But at least you know you have looked at all aspects of the work!

There you go!

Practice? Sure. Take a piece you have written, and try walking through the four steps. Now, did your piece end up improved?

Good time to submit it to Writers@mit.edu and see what happens!
tink


[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writer's Digest, August 2004, page 15 has a short note warning about common pairs of words that we often confuse in usage. Specifically:
  1. Convince and persuade. "You convince someone of an idea; you persuade someone to act." Changing their minds? That's convincing. Changing what they do? That's persuasion.
  2. Ensure and insure. Insurance has to do with money. Ensuring means making sure something happens.
  3. Because of or due to. When the question is why something happened, the answer is because of something else. Due to goes with nouns. What's funny is that the answer for both examples given in Writer's Digest is rain. The game was canceled because of rain. And the cancellation was due to rain. Methinks a bit more differentiation of the examples would have been helpful.
  4. That and which. My own favorite mistake. Use that for essential clauses. Which, separated by commas, is used for nonessential clauses. Not that I understand it well, but the phrase, which I borrowed for the occasion, came wrapped in punctuation.
  5. Anxious and eager. Anxious includes the notion of fear or worry. Eager is just plain excited. When we think we did well on a test, we might be eager to get the results. But when we really don't want to know, we might be anxious to get the results.
These may not be your favorite confusions and wordy contortions. But you might want to keep an eye out for the words that you stumble over. When you find yourself replacing which with that for the umpteenth time, you might as well make it part of your personal editing to do a search and destroy on dangling whiches. Or whatever you find tricksy.

Got it? Take these or other lists of confusing words and phrases, and keep track of where you find yourself stumbling a bit. Then make sure you check those during the polishing of your stories.

Like using fine-grit sandpaper to finish up the woodwork. Get rid of those scratches and splinters before the editors get hung up on them.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
(heck, I think you're already playing this game - still, here it is in exercise format :-)

A quick and quirky exercise from Writer's Digest. July 2004, page 17 suggests writing a short piece and trying to cram as many cliches as possible into it. They provide a bloated parody of an inspirational piece as an example, but you can clearly do it anyway that you like. You could decide to write a 500 word review, loaded to the brim with cliches, overused metaphors, and other purple prose? Or perhaps just a personal reflection on the beauty of nose hairs, or some such delight? But lay on the cliches as thick as the lard filled sugar frosting on the wedding cake. Heap them high as the mountains, as far as the eye can see, and as thick as . . . as thick as molasses?

Oh, yes, once you've overused your cliches, the notion is that you might resist their use in the future. So don't get attached to those cliches!

here is their example:
Vocabulary-challenged writers often feel trapped between a rock and a hard place. How can you write more exciting sentences without actually learning new words? Fear not -- even if your sentences aren't exactly pushing the linguistic envelope, don't assume that, talent-wise, your glass is half-empty. You just need to think outside the box -- literally. Take a walk, see a movie, test-drive a Porsche; do anything that will get the blood flowing again. And remember, at the end of the day, the bottom line's still the same: writing isn't rocket science. Bear with it.
Go ahead, you can beat that with a stick, can't you?

The cliches have it!
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Here is Nancy Kress's revised version. What do you think? How did you revise it?
Jane staggered into the bathroom and splashed cold water on her eyes. Last night, Barry had insisted on buying her martinis -- way too many martinis. Appalled, Jane peered into the mirror. Blood-shot eyes, pasty skin -- she looked like a burned-over forest. Maybe she should take something. Aspirin? Valium? Cyanide? Nothing would help this. "Oh, shit."
There you go!

So what happens next with Jane and Barry, anyway?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Just in case you want to try it, here is Nancy Kress's sample paragraph. Go ahead and try rewriting it, remembering her advice about strong verbs, precise nouns, light on the modifiers, controlled pronouns, careful conjunctions, adjusting the prepositions, and the proper use of interjections. A little later this week, I'll send out her corrected version so that you can see one example of editing lean and mean.
Jane walked with awkward slowness into her lavatory and put cold water on her eyes. She was tired and had drunk too much the night before. Barry had been buying her drinks and wouldn't take no for an answer. Jane looked at herself and, pretty upset, closed her eyes from the mirror. She looked and felt terrible. Maybe she should take something to help, but she didn't think it would. "Rats," she said dispiritedly.
Poor Jane. But you can do something to help! You can make her paragraph sing. Go ahead, you know you want to rewrite it.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
"Words are the essential nutrients of our stories. And, too often, we get so caught up in our idea, characters, setting, emotions and plot, we lose sight of the basics. Our writing ends up flabby and weak." Nancy Kress, Writer's Digest, July 2004, p. 29
That's how Nancy Kress starts her article about rewriting. In it, she takes a flabby paragraph and turns it into a stronger one. She points out a number of places to work on. Let's take a look at her points, and maybe toss in some thoughts of our own along the way, okay?

Nancy starts with the verbs, which she calls the energy source of sentences. She recommends using strong verbs, and selecting them with care. Beware the adverb or modifying phrase. She also warns against various groups of verbs such as:
  1. "there was" constructions
  2. Verbizations of nouns for business purposes
  3. the progressive past when the simple past will do
Once you've tightened up the verbs, look at the nouns. Nancy calls these the muscles. Specific, concrete, well-suited to the situation and the characters, nouns are the building blocks. Make sure they are solid ones!

Modifiers, the sugar and spice of the writing life. Part of the concern here is simply avoiding overuse. Nancy warns against weak adjectives, unnecessary adjectives, an adjective overload -- dirty, gray, dingy, half melted snow is just plain yucky. She suggests a litmus test for adjectives -- "if you remove it, do you alter the meaning or image?" If not, get rid of it.

Pronouns -- make sure they have some referent, and if possible, just one. And do your best to align the plural and singular in verbs and pronouns and stuff like that?

Conjunctions. Vary your sentences. Beware of falling into a pattern, and repeating it again and again. While extended sentences are nice, variation keeps the reader awake.

Prepositions -- up, too, from, with, for, around and under. Good ways to connect directions and scenery, but be careful to avoid the endless run-on sentence and the dangling modifier.

Interjections are probably something that we were not taught in English class, since they don't belong in formal writing. But damn, they are certainly useful in fiction. Nancy advises us to make sure the interjections match the character -- the small-town minister is unlikely to strew "by the bloody bones" throughout his speech. Avoid stereotypes. And while profanity may be natural for some characters, don't overuse it.

Something to check in your writing. Make sure that the verbs, nouns, and other words are right for the fight, and who knows, maybe the knockout will hit!

What do you think? Do you pay attention to the words in your writing? Do you go back and re-read it, tweaking a word here and a phrase there, rearranging sections and checking just how individual characters talk and walk and twist their mustaches (and those are the women!)?

Make those words ring!
tink
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Mon, 7 Mar 1994 15:48:59 JST

bon - just to prove I'm not completely braindead...

- Agreed -- so the solution is to teach people to write more concisely,
- and to edit their own writing more carefully.

Agreed. Concise writing and careful self-editing are critical.

(pun intentional)
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 23:15:46 EST

On Thu, 05 Feb 1998 14:29:47 EST, BARBARA scribed:
:) Is focus the problem? Is inability to organize thoughts the
:) problem? If so, then how come I can do interactives, and gather my
:) thoughts reasonably coherently when I'm doing filler type things?
:) What is really the problem? Has anyone experienced this and found
:) some solutions?

Not sure what it is, but I think I recognize the symptoms...

Here's one of the tricks I use. I print out whatever I've gotten written (which often includes chunks from dictionaries, etc.)

Go away from the computer, sit down and read through it all.

Put the stack away.

Now, from memory, without pushing, write down the keywords, key points (pencil and pen works best for me here...err, make that pencil and paper) Not really an outline, just the main bits I want to stress.

Rearrange. I number them, mark through them, copy them to another sheet in a better order, discard the oddball one that doesn't fit.

(often, sleep on it and see what the backbrain wants to toss up. sometimes there's a great point or a metaphor just waiting for you to NOT pay attention, when it will casually wander out.)

And then, with this little list of points (3-5, seven if I'm pushing my readers), I'll sit down and pull out the pieces of the writing that fit the list. Discard extra. Add transitions and other stuff.

Put it in the oven and bake...no, that's another story. How to Serve Children? (do you prefer rare or well-done, sir?)

That "put the detailed writing away for a while and write down a simple list" step seems to help me focus a lot.

Maybe?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting: Sun, 17 May 1998 01:05:47 EDT

:) From: Susannah
:)
:) Hi tink!
:) Thanks very much for this. I have a question:
:) Why stay out of your character's head? If I had not mocked up the
:) character and then written from his viewpoint, I would not
:) have a novel. Perhaps I don't understand what you mean?
:) One more below:
:) Susannah

This is very much a question of individual style. For example, 1st person writing very naturally gives access to the individual's thoughts (but not to other characters' thoughts!). 3rd person--the limited viewpoint hovering near a single character--does allow the author to dip into the main character's head.

But there is a danger here, similar to the danger in dialogue of "As you know" syndrome--where the characters talk for the benefit of the reader, rather than to each other. That danger is that instead of showing the reader the actions and dialogue that will let the reader figure out what the character is thinking/feeling, the author simply has the _interior monologue_ tell the reader.

I can remember one case where the writer actually had rather nice descriptions--and ended almost every paragraph with something like "He felt his rage rising." Just in case I had somehow missed the hands clenching into fists, the pounding roar in his ears, and all the other fine details. I didn't appreciate the continuing insight into what the character was thinking/feeling. I felt as if the author didn't trust me to figure out what was happening (or they had written the summary sentences first, then went back and filled it out--and forgot to remove the summaries?)

I'm really pointing to the thought which Renni Browne and Dave King express in Self-Editing for Fiction Writers in the section on "Interior Monologue." (p. 75 ff)
(p. 76)

"Interior monologue allows you not only to disclose information that would be hard to bring out in dialogue...but also to give your readers a feel for who your characters are. There is, arguably, no easier way to explore a character or express a reaction to events than through interior monologue. After all, you can let your readers in on exactly what your characters really think without having to filter that thought through dialogue and action. Interior monologue is an intimate, powerful way to establish a character's voice--and personality."

"And, as you might expect, interior monologue is so powerful and easy to write (though not easy to write well) that many fiction writers tend to overuse it..."

(p. 84) "One final caveat. When you're self-editing, be on the lookout for long passages of interior monologue. As we've suggested, they usually mean you are telling the reader things you should be showing..."
To keep it simple, I put it as "stay out of the characters' heads." I think there are times when this is ridiculous advice--what you really want to show is what is going on "in there." But in general, I'd suggest be sparing with the dips into the internal life of the character(s)--that's strong medicine, and you want to use it where it does the right job.

Does that help?
tink
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 16:31:55 JST

This is one way to sing the tribal lay [Mr. Kipling, I presume?]

Usually I start with a phrase, often one that has been resounding in the noisy echo chamber of my mind for a while. When I notice these, I write them down.

After a while or at the time, I listen to myself, playing with the phrase. Its internal beat, imagery, and random thoughts bring forth other raw bits. These I put down as they occur to me, often with some variations, until I have a good stack of jackstraws.

Now I start polishing pieces, fitting them together, turning them inside out, backwards, tossing them back on the stack, suddenly pulling a new straw out of thin air. I read them out loud, try out variations, scratch and pound to hear the sound.

At some point, this warm cauldron of super-critical solution usually starts to crystallize, with a lurch and a drone, into blocks. [Be careful, it can just boil over and make a mess of your clothes, but that doesn't happen too often.]

Now comes the final polishing for this stage. I clear away the extra straw, and look closely at the crystal formed in the middle. I read it, testing each word, and each image, looking for weak spots and flaws. Sometimes it's as small a thing as adding a comma, or switching tenses, sometimes I rip out a whole section or toss the whole mess aside, but at this point I'm as critical as I can be with myself. Sometimes the whole mess goes back into the cauldron and gets stirred again.

Next comes a cooling phase, just as in tempering metals. If you have a handy friend or writer's discussion group, you might try the ice water plunge - let them rip it. But you need someone who won't pull punches for this. [Why is it that immediately upon submitting to such scrutiny, tinny spots, gaping holes, and sheer idiotic goofs become vividly evident to your own idle review? Should be a murphy's law about that.]

Lacking that, or preferring a more gentle tempering, set it aside. I find that I need at least two weeks, with a month better, and even longer is best, to let the echoes of the forging fade away. When you've forgotten it, then pick it up again, and read it with the eyes of a stranger. Does it demand your attention? Do the words, the phrases, the images pulse and beat with life as you read them? Does it make you stop and read it slowly, aloud, listening to your own voice bring tears to your eyes? Do you feel as though you should stop strangers in the street and read it to them, just for the joy of seeing their eyes open as the words carry them out of everyday life and into nirvana?

If it does, congratulations. Put a copy in your files and start sending it out. Otherwise, either toss it in the scraps file to try again later, or polish it again in the same glowing heat, then temper again.

What always amazes (and somewhat irritates) me is when someone glances as something that has been through this process and says something about how natural and simple it is. I've almost learned not to jump on them and scream about how much effort went into making it read that way, but it's still hard to realize that this is one of the highest compliments, that you've gone beyond studied artfulness into the craft of Art. Think of bonsai - years of effort to make a tree look "just like the tree growing on the cliff near my house."

Make sure your poetry isn't noticed, just enjoyed. [oh, oh, he's trying for subtleness. Get ready to catch him, he always trips himself when he does this...]

I wish I knew enough about rhythm and blues to help with the technical side of things, but maybe this description will help a little. Guess I'm just a guy who grew up with hard rock and leaves of grass, and knows (sometimes) what he likes, but doesn't know all the right words. One last advice - keep belting 'em out, anyway you can, and someone will hear echoes of themselves resonating in your words.

['zat's about enough of that, boss man. go have a cuppa and let someone else have the drum for a while, ok?]
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:42:06 -0500

Hi...

Here's a thought.  Take one of those wonderful confusions of the grammatically oriented, and write a bon mot, a poem, perhaps a tale focusing on the differentia?  In other words, provide a memorable little way of both recognizing the possible confusion, understanding the difference, and remembering the recommended way out!

For example, one might choose to venture into the difference between and betwixt "they're" and "their".  Perhaps a slight of dialog (careful, it may not be possible to write the sentence you're thinking of!) and a bit of a humorous chuckle at your cleverness in using that slip of the thought between what you are thinking and what your mind is doing?

Anyway, I'm certain you have your favorite grammatical point to grind, and perhaps you're already writing?

Go ahead, raise a point of grammar, and grind it fine!
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:24:00 -0500

Let's take a look at some thoughts from Writing As a Lifelong Skill by Sanford Kaye, ISBN 0-534-22218-8

Up to Now: Your Writing History

"B.  Process and Product.  A second, issue to explore is the emphasis your teachers placed on correctness and on writing as an act of communication."

"The teaching of writing evolves over time and the emphasis shifts from one generation to the next.  Over the last twenty years, the trend has been away from identifying problems toward developing strategies for clear thinking and for communicating with a variety of readers.  There are still some people who think that correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling ensure a good piece of writing.  Other people, without much regard to the conventions of standard English, feel their mistakes are trivial as long as they make themselves reasonably clear to readers.  But either extreme, simple correctness or pure expression, is self-defeating.  A perfect paper that doesn't say anything is as unreadable as a heartfelt paper that is filled with mistakes.  Readers, of course, prefer a balance of clarity and power."

The question, of course, is how important these two are to you.  How important is correctness in grammar, punctuation, and spelling?  How important is clear thinking and communicating with readers?  How do you balance the need for expressive power and the desire for careful adherence to conventions?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:31:16 -0500

We were watching a short silent movie on the arts channel this evening.  I noticed that lacking the dialogue, I seemed to pay more attention to the props, the background, the hand motions and other parts.

So, here's the trick.  You might use it as an editing aid.

Take a scene (your writing, or someone else's).  Easiest on the computer, but you could also do it using a photocopy (I almost said a X?????, but remembered that word is a trademark, so we'll use photocopy instead).

Delete (or mark over) all the dialogue!  Yes, no one said anything.

Now read through it again.  Is there a viable background?  Do the characters do something while their talking heads ramble (now silently)?

Dialogue is a very strong part of your toolbox.  Be careful to include the other tools in every scene (a dash of description, a healthy splash of action, and a bit of pixie dust, mystery, and whatnot to thicken the soup).

Okay, you can put your dialogue back now.

And imagine how those silent film directors felt when they finally got talkies!

[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Mon, 9 May 1994 18:35:01 JST

Self-Editing for Fiction Writers
Browne, Renni and King, Dave
ISBN 0-06-270061-8
HarperCollins, NY
1993, $11.00

A short outline of points of the book I noted (but read the book - it's worth it!)

1. Show and Tell
  • Prefer showing scenes to narrative summaries telling us about things. The scene is setting, character, dialogue, action. Every main event should be a scene!
  • Balance - narrative summaries are a kind of rest, a good place for off-stage and minor action.
  • Don't tell us about emotions - show them. Wherever possible, cut explanations. Then if it is needed, figure out a way to show it.
  • Resist the urge to explain (R.U.E.)
2. Characterization and Exposition
  • Don't stop the story to give us a summary of character - let these emerge from action, reaction, and dialogue. I.e., avoid thumbnail character sketches.
  • Beware flashbacks, analysis, history - do you really need it?
  • Watch for the dialogue or interior monologue that is only there to feed information to the reader - cut it!
  • Give your readers the benefit of the doubt - let them interpret the character. Assume your reader is intelligent.
  • Let the way the character looks at things or does things introduce us to the character.
  • Rule of thumb: give your reader only as much background info, history, or characterization as they need at this point.
  • Don't let your characterization and exposition show...
3. Point of View
  • 1st, 3rd, omniscient - consider how intimate your reader and viewpoint should be. Then use the one that does the job.
  • Establish POV fast.
  • Whenever POV changes, check how fast you establish it.
  • Make sure - are you using your characters' voices?
4. Dialogue Mechanics
  • R.U.E. - make the dialogue show the emotion, don't tell us about it.
  • Kill -ly adverbs.
  • Prefer "said".
  • Start a paragraph with dialogue, then attribute at the first natural break.
  • Use beats (little actions).
  • Dash for interruption; ellipsis (...) for trailing off.
  • Make it natural.
5. See How It Sounds
  • Use contractions, fragments, commas instead of periods, short words, and misdirection (let your characters misunderstand, answer the wrong question, talk at cross-purposes, hedge, lie, etc...)
  • read it aloud.
  • Try reading only one character all together, then another, etc.
  • Are the "voices" distinct?
  • Use word choice, cadence, grammar - not spelling.
6. Interior Monologue
  • very powerful tool of text - make sure it's unobtrusive.
  • trim unneeded - explanations and descriptions.
  • change "He wondered ..." to "Why did he ...?"
7. Easy Beats
  • Beats are the "little actions" between dialogue lines - stage business.
  • good - show action, vary rhythm of dialogue.
  • bad - overused (as I tend to do) they are distracting.
  • balance - trust your reader.
  • use fresh beats that characterize and help rhythm. Be especially careful of repeating the same strong characterizing beat again and again.
8. Breaking Up Is Easy To Do
  • Prefer short paragraphs, but balance long and short.
  • Watch long scenes - break them up!
  • Watch for speeches - bust them into pieces.
9. Once Is Usually Enough
  • avoid repetition. don't repeat. and, of course, saying something twice may not be a good idea, even if the words are different.
  • note that repetition can be words, effects, information, characterization, characters, whole scenes... 1 + 1 = 1/2! Repeated effects lose effect, instead of increasing it.
10. Proportion
  • Watch for excess descriptive detail, pet interests out of hand.
  • Be careful when cutting - you may destroy proportion and balance.
  • Time (words spent) on character, scene, plot element, etc. roughly indicates importance to the reader - don't disappoint them!
  • Try marking the interesting parts, then consider the leftovers - are they needed? Do they add? Should they be shorter? Longer?
  • Cut or rework...
  • Use jump/cut - don't walk someone along every step, just jump the scenes.
  • Avoid overblown details, overdone flashbacks, and excess tangents.
  • But - the little subplots or descriptions not strictly advancing plot - are they all effective? if you don't have any, do you need some?
11. Sophistication
  • avoid "pulling on her coat, she xxxx." and "As she cried, she xxxx." both bury an action in dependent clause.
  • avoid cliches and cliched characters. at least, try warping it for effect. e.g. They vanished into thick air.
  • every time you find a verb-adverb, try to find the right verb instead.
  • comma string sentences, reproducing the urgency of action, pushing the reader ahead.
  • Watch "quotes" ,_italics_, and exclamation points!!!
  • avoid overly poetic figures of speech in the midst of action.
  • sex and profanity have tended to flourish - try light use.
12. Voice
  • relax - if it comes, it comes on its own.
  • a mechanical aid - read your work, and note each line that "sings" to you. then read just those lines - that's your voice at present!
  • now read it all again - and note the winces, the tinny lines.
  • read just those, and consider applying:
  • flat? is it buried in lines of the same structure?
  • abstract or vague? rewrite it for specific
  • obvious? see if you aren't explaining - and cut it!
  • forced or other problem - read it aloud and fix it.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Fri, 29 Apr 1994 18:35:01 JST

Self-Editing for Fiction Writers
Browne, Renni and King, Dave
ISBN 0-06-270061-8
HarperCollins, NY
1993, $11.00

An excellent book for any writer, especially if you believe in revision as a key part of their writing. If you don't, this book may help convert you.

The two authors are both writers and "book doctors," making a living providing editorial help to writers, and know their business inside out.

Each chapter focuses on one key topic of self-editing, looking at it with examples from both well-known authors (critiquing the classics!) and other sources. They end with a checklist and exercises (which let you try out the principles). There also are rather droll cartoons to help remind you of the principles. Good for self-study, and I could see structuring workshops around this book without any difficulty.

One of the interesting points about the book is that it rarely rules out something entirely, preferring to discuss the reasons you might or might not want to use some technique and the alternatives. They also stress balance - e.g. don't cut out all repetition, but use it for a reason. They seem to be more interested in developing authors who understand what they are doing than in simply laying out a blind pattern for beginners, and that's something I like in a book.

Incidentally, they indicate that publishers now rarely do much editing, mostly taking the author's work as it stands and putting it in print. Given some of the junk I see in print, this may be true. Unfortunately, it means the author needs to be even more careful about revision and self-editing because that final polishing isn't being done by the publishers anymore.

I'm still writing up my notes from the book, but if you're looking for help in the revision process, I'd recommend trying this book.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original Posting: Sat, 29 Jan 1994 18:35:02 JST

This is both the simplest and the most effective aid to editing that I know.

Read it out loud.

When you run out of breath, can't figure out which way the sentence went, need to pause, stumble over the words, lose the points in the bramble - you need to fix it.

If you don't do this already, try it. You may like it.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Fri, 9 Sep 1994 18:35:01 JST

1. Lacking sensory detail
Make sure your characters see, hear, touch, taste, and smell the world around them. Kinesthetic (body/muscle) and other feelings are important cues, too. Don't overdo it, but when your character would ordinarily notice something, make the reader see and feel that detail.
2. Irrelevant emphasis
This is the flipside of the previous problem. Unimportant or unlikely things are described in detail, whether they fit the story or not. When a hungry, tired hero still manages to notice and describe every tiny detail of the department store he is running through, something is wrong...
3. Frustrating omissions
One of my favorite mistakes--in the push to get to the next part, skimming over important or key elements needed to let the reader understand what is happening. Probably easier to correct during revision--make sure the details are there, and show the reader, don't tell them...
4. Weak, over-used words
A partial list: very, but, then, seem, felt, suddenly, rather, almost, nearly, slightly, certain, quite, was, -ing and -ly words.
5. POV shifts
Unless you have a good reason to jerk the reader from head to head or place to place, don't do it. Again, something to check during revision--are you staying with the established point-of-view?
6. Mechanics
  1. Is any passage awkwardly worded?
  2. Are there unnecessary or redundant words or phrases?
  3. Are there cliches?
  4. Are the verbs vivid? Adjectives evocative?
  5. Are the sentences too long? Too short? Too similar? Does the rhythm of the sentences match the action?
  6. Is there too much exposition? Narrative summary?
  7. Is there sufficient unintended grammatical errors to pull the reader's attention away from the story? (excuse me...:-)
  8. Is there a story underneath the literary and stylistic facade?
Basic point--watch the mechanics, double-check them, and where they need patching, do the revision. It isn't exciting, but the best comment a reader can make about the mechanics is "I didn't even notice it," so make it smooth.

and keep writing!
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting: Sun, 23 Oct 1994 21:46:02 EDT

1. Write a paragraph. Your choice on characters, action, etc. but make sure something happens in the course of the paragraph (even just having one character get up and cross the room).

[100 words? no, shorter than that.]

2. Break it up. Take at least one part of the action and rewrite it into a "clue" or "foreshadowing" part. Then insert some other material in the middle--a flashback, perhaps another scene from another part of the action, a little description, some other stuff--and finish by rewriting the ending of the first action.

[go back in and slice it up, then put some stuffing in...]

3. Keep stretching that original action. You can add some blocks and difficulties, you can add more "filling," you can turn that original paragraph into a thin framework binding all the parts of a whole novel into chunks interrupting your character slowly walking across the room...

[and then get the pump out, put a funnel in and grind sausage into the casing to fill the little monster out, get on top and stomp more into the edges...]

Don't let the reader down. Slow down the action...unless it needs to be fast and heavy.

and sell a few more words, too!
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
[sit up straight, class! now, since some of the seats seem to be at best half-full, I will skip calling the roll, merely noting en passant that the final test will be based on materials presented in the lectures, and you may be assured that I will not grade on a curve, but rather I will grade quite harshly...so tell your friends to come to class!]

For the purpose of today's little exercise, I will assume that you can find somewhere a story that isn't quite working. If not your own, then perhaps someone else's? Or, if all else fails, you may use one of your perfect tales of wonder... You can also start with an idea or some such that you would like to turn into a story.

[POP QUIZ!!!]

Take the following list and answer each question.

Background

1. Where are we? (setting)
2. Who is involved? (characters, strengths, flaws)
3. Where are they headed? (goals, motives)
4. What stops or blocks them? (obstacle(s))
5. What are they going to do about it? (plans to overcome problems)

Story

6. What hook(s) or bait for the reader will I use? (where start)
What story question do I pose for the reader?
7. What backfill is needed? (background that needs to be filled in)
8. What buildup do I want? (scenes)
9. What is the climax?
- how does the character change? (overcome weakness, etc.)
- how is the plot resolved? (overcome problems and achieve goals)
- What answer does the reader get to the story question?

Higher Level

10. What purpose, moral, or theme am I writing about?

With luck, problem stories or ideas trying to turn into stories will develop as one works through these questions. In any case, pondering at least a sketch of an answer to these points may help.

So there you have it. A list of little questions to prod your stories into shape, to stretch your doughy thoughts into a pie shell filled with the life stories of four and twenty black birds, or even a way to analyze why someone else's tale works so well...

[what? a mustard seed to build a faith on? well, if you insist...]

"Once upon a time..." he said, and stopped to wipe the tears from his eyes.

[who is he talking to? why is he crying? what will he say next? see pop quiz above for more questions...and make those keyboards click!]

for those who haven't danced this way before--take the beginning line, and unroll your tale...

with a cheery grin hanging in the air, left behind by the cheshire cat

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 03:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios