[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 1 May 2008

I have a confession to make. While I didn't appreciate Oprah on TV in the United States some time ago, I have started reading the occasional columns from CNN, and find them possibly useful for writers.

If you haven't read one, they usually point to some kind of problem that most of us face sometime, and then lay out several possible variations of the problem and solutions. See, these are proven items of interest to the general public. And some clues about how to handle the issues. So all you have to do is pick one, add characters and scenery, and . . . you've at least got the basis of a story, eh?

For example? Okay, here's one about the lonely season at http://www.oprah.com/spiritself/omag/ss_omag_200502_mbeck.jhtml (interesting, that's not the link that CNN gave me, but when I went to find the thing, I ended up going through the Oprah.com home page at http://www2.oprah.com/index.jhtml and their search - and that's the same article, at least). Aha, if I use the CNN search, I get http://edition.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/personal/04/23/lonely.season/ which is the page I remembered.

Sorry about that diversion into the minutia of finding articles on the web. Back to the main topic.

The problem that this article raises is loneliness. Martha Beck suggests that there are three kinds of loneliness, and provides quick fixes and long-term solutions for each kind.

First is absolute loneliness, a feeling that no one understands us and no one wants to. This kind of isolation hurts. The quick fix is to force interaction. Go out one way or another and meet people. The longer-term solution is to start developing social skills. Try to understand others and help them understand you. Try three steps: show real appreciation or an honest compliment (my gloss: or at least a comment that shows you are looking at them), followed by curiosity -- a question. The third step is optional, sometimes when they are clearly interesting or charming, volunteer some information about yourself. You don't have to start with deep revelations, just keep the conversation going.

There's hardly a teenager alive who hasn't run into this one a few dozen times and bloodied their head on it.

Second is separation loneliness. Changing jobs, changing homes, traveling -- modern life sometimes seems to consist mostly of separations. The quick fix is to use the separation to remind yourself or motivate yourself to reach out to the people you miss. Make that phone call, summarize your day in an e-mail, maybe even use the letter paper or postcard in the hotel room. Ask them what they've been doing, and pay attention to the answer. Long-term: think hard about whether that new job or whatever is causing the separations is really worth it. Decide what you want at your very heart and then go for it.

Running through the storms of middle-age, this kind of loneliness is a neverending windstorm.  (You knew I would get a metaphor in here somewhere, right?)

Third is existential loneliness. Every human sometimes has to face the fact that no one else really can take the risks for us, face our losses, or give us self-esteem. In some ways, we each face life alone. A quick fix is art. Whether it is great art, genre novels, dance contests on TV -- let those people remind you of the inspiration. Long-term: consider your own life as art. You don't have to be a great artist, but think about what conveys your real self, and use your own creativity to reach out to others.

(Please sing a verse of The Impossible Dream . . . one man, scorned and covered with scars, still strove . . . the unreachable star! Hankies, anyone?)

Interesting article -- and if you take a number from one to three, I think any one of these could be the core of the story. A character facing absolute loneliness? You can meet them in so many places, but show one breaking out of that pickup line of dishonesty into real interaction. Sounds like a good story to me. Or how about separation loneliness? How does the traveling salesman manage to keep in touch with that four year old? What about existential loneliness? When the world is just too much -- write?

Go ahead, dig through some of those Oprah articles, and see if they don't suggest some stories.

Did I tell you the one about the ten guys that women should avoid? Good basis for something over in the romance field, maybe? Take a look at http://us.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/personal/02/25/O.bad.men/index.html

(to try when your arms are too weary . . . )
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
We are slowly working our way through Plot & Structure by James Scott Bell. In his chapter 4, he talks about beginnings. He suggests we need to get the reader involved, connect the reader with the lead character, introduce the story world, establish the general tone or genre of the story, force the reader to keep reading, and introduce the opposition. And that's just for starters!

The next section concerns the use of prologues. I'm not sure that I agree with Bell about using them, especially since so many editors advise new writers to avoid them. Get right into the action goes the cry. Still, since so many people want to try them, I suppose we should talk about how to use them best. Bell points out that effective prologues do one thing -- entice the reader to go on and read Chapter 1. Sounds simple, right? And there are only really three kinds of prologue.

First, the action prologue. A big scene, maybe a death. Suspense fiction loves to use these to kick things off. Excitement, suspense, what is going to happen? Then cut to Chapter 1. The prologue may or may not involve the lead character, but it needs to be big on action, relatively short, usually end with trouble, and at some point you want to tie it into the main plot or at least explain what happened. I suppose in some sense this is the disturbance writ large, upsetting lives before the story even starts.

Second, a frame story. This is where a character looks back and tells us the story. The inner story or extended flashback has consequences rolling into the now of the frame. One of the drawbacks to a frame is that we know this character will live, says he or she is telling the story in the frame. The frame needs to establish the feeling and tone for the main plot, should be interesting good reading in itself, and should show how the events of the past affect the prologue character now.

Third, there are teasers. A little scene at the beginning that happens later on in the book. Don't finish the scene, leave the reader wondering how it ends. And then when the scene happens in the ordinary sequence of the story, finish it out. Teasers need to be highly charged scenes, and stop short of resolution so that the reader wants to find out what happened. You can use the same words, or you can tackle it a little bit differently.

Okay. So one way to start the beginning is with one of these forms of prologue. In some books you'll find extended prologues, while others don't use the labels but still use the format. Fair warning, many editors recommend not using them, but just going ahead and starting your story.

The next part that Bell talks about is establishing a bond between the reader and the lead character. One of the tricks here is that the lead character needs to be a strong, rich character. Bell refers to Egri's advice "about living, vibrating human beings being the secret of great and enduring writing. Egri suggested that if you truly know yourself, deeply and intimately, you'll be able to create great, complex, and interesting characters." But when you have a character, how do you get readers to relate to him or her? Bell suggests four dynamics: identification, sympathy, likability, and inner conflict.

Identification means that we believe the lead character is like us. If circumstances were right, that could be us in the plot with those reactions. The lead character needs to be trying to accomplish something, be fearful and honestly react, and not be perfect. Normal human flaws are part of what makes us identify with a lead character. Superman without any flaws isn't someone we can empathize with. But give him some understandable fears and failings, and suddenly we can put ourselves in his shoes.

Sympathy strengthens the emotional investment in the lead character. Don't overdo it, but when the hero is in jeopardy, faces hardship that is undeserved, is coming up from behind (the infamous underdog), or has vulnerabilities -- that's when we feel sympathy and root for the lead character.

Likability, well, that's someone who does things that we like. They do favors for other people, they're witty, they make us feel good about ourselves. Think about people you like, and what it is that they do, then see if your lead character can do some of those things.

Inner conflict. Having doubts and concerns about what to do next makes the character more interesting. This doesn't mean waffling or grandiose extended bouts of self-examination, but just real honest uncertainty.

All right? So we've taken a look at getting the reader hooked and developing a bond between the reader and the lead character. You might take a look at the beginning chapter in a book you like, and consider how the writer got your interest and developed a link between you and the lead character. And don't forget, we've still got several bits of the beginning to go.

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 04:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios