mbarker: (Burp)
[personal profile] mbarker
 Original Posting Jan. 25, 2019

(for anyone just joining us, I'm walking slowly through James Scott Bell's book Super Structure. Today, we're on the very first beat in his list.)

Disturbance! The first signpost along the way. Bell starts by asking us what the first shot after the credits is in the Wizard of Oz. No matter what you might think, it’s a young girl running on a dirt road, with her dog, looking back over her shoulder. She’s obviously frightened, but we have no idea why. But we do know that something is disturbing!

That moment of disturbance, of upset, is what you want to start your story with. Not laying out the wood for a fire, but lighting the match.

Bell warns us that too many manuscripts start with what he calls the Happy People in Happy Land Fallacy. A chapter with no conflict, no trouble, nice characters, nice world... an ordinary life in an ordinary day.

What isn’t wrong with these people! Bell says, “The problem is the scene is too boring to hold our interest. ... what hooks a reader to a character is not how nice they are, but what trouble, challenge, or change threatens them.” Disturbing, right!

So, make trouble. Stir the pot! Right away.

Bell gives us some examples. Twilight starts with Bella’s mother driving her to the airport. We’re thrust right into the change! Or you could allude to a terrible change coming, as Dean Koontz does. Or perhaps a disturbance that has already happened, and will be explained? Intriguing first lines are always good...

Or sometimes the first paragraph just ends with a jolt, a hook that pulls us in. “Across the room sat the man who murdered his father.” Ouch! Disturbing...

Even literary (character more than plot) stories often have disturbing beginnings.

Bell reminds us that the opening, the start, of your story is what makes it work. Agent, editor, reader... they all want to see an opening that engages us, right away. Disturbance does that. “Trouble is the lifeblood of fiction.” So, as the old song says, “We’ve got trouble my friends, right here...”

So, how do you get that opening? Bell suggests writing several opening lines. Try out an opening with two characters in a tense dialogue.

Conflict, trouble, disturbance!

By the way, if things are slowing down or you aren’t sure what to do next with your story, try a little disturbance, trouble, conflict. Sprinkle disturbances throughout your story. Keep the pot boiling...

And make sure to start with a healthy disturbance!
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting 4 January 2009

Just in case you were wondering, today's the first day of the 2009 Writers 6x6!

Yeah!

So what does that mean? Well, some of us are going to write one story each week for the next six weeks and put them up here. Somewhere between 300 and 5,000 words. And we will be posting on Saturdays -- so keep your eyes open.

That doesn't mean that we have to stop all the other fun and fantasy. If you want to talk about an interesting insight, go ahead. But I have to admit I'm probably thinking about this week's story. Nothing up this sleeve, and, well, yeah, there's a little pile of scribbly notes in that pocket, but ignore them, here, just pull the curtain across them.

Hey! If you'd like some hints about putting together a story, let's take a look at some of the bits and pieces from Plot And Structure.

The intro talks about the need to get motivated, try stuff, play, get those first drafts out there, and keep going. Good thoughts for the 6x6 scribbling, eh? See http://community.livejournal.com/writercises/157549.html for a little summary, or read the book -- James Scott Bell.

Then there's the notion of LOCK. Lead character, Objective, Confrontation, and Knockout ending. Someone that we want to empathize with, who wants to go somewhere or do something, and runs into conflicts, complications, and problems on the way. And then there's the climax, the knockout ending that makes the reader say, "WOW! I didn't expect that, but it's really satisfying." Over here http://community.livejournal.com/writercises/158673.html is a summary. And this one http://community.livejournal.com/writercises/158902.html talks a little bit more about it, including this handy template:
  • My lead is a [fill in the blank]
  • Her objective is to [fill in the blank]
  • She is confronted by [fill in the blank] who oppose her because [fill in more blanks]
  • The ending will be a knockout when [fill in the final blank]
Fill in the blanks, and you're partway to a story!

But what about the plot? Well, we can use the old standby three act structure. Over here's there's more details http://community.livejournal.com/writercises/159814.html but for now, let's consider it as a disturbance and two doorways. The disturbance is at the beginning, when something takes the hero out of their normal routine. It could be small, or it could be catastrophic -- your choice. But the hero starts moving. The doorways are one-way doorways. The first one commits the hero to the action. This is where the hero decides they are going to do it. And then the complications really start! The second doorway ushers in the climax -- and usually has the hero at their worst, beaten, bleeding, and close to surrender. But then, they turn around, and . . . beat the odds, win the impossible gamble, do it! Simple, right? But it's amazing how many stories and novels use this structure.

What, no ideas yet? Okay, okay, take a look at these. http://community.livejournal.com/writercises/160687.html and http://community.livejournal.com/writercises/160805.html and http://community.livejournal.com/writercises/161770.html all provide some approaches to the fun of ideas. The first one talks about digging into your own beliefs and attitudes. The second one has a number of suggestions about ways to spark ideas. What if, borrow a plot, flip a genre, randomize, and have fun! And the third one helps you decide which ideas are really good -- hook, line, sinker!

And you probably thought this was going to be a quiet session of introspection? Huh. Pick a number from one to six? Got it? Good, here's your quote:
  1. "Determine never to be idle... It is wonderful how much may be done if we are always doing." Thomas Jefferson
  2. "We have too many high sounding words, and too few actions that correspond with them." Abigail Adams
  3. "I have witnessed the softening of the hardest of hearts by a simple smile." Goldie Hawn
  4. "My philosophy is that not only are you responsible for your life, but doing the best at this moment puts you in the best place for the next moment." Oprah Winfrey
  5. "For me, it's that I contributed,... That I'm on this planet doing some good and making people happy. That's to me the most important thing, that my hour of television is positive and upbeat and antidote for all the negative stuff going on in life." Ellen DeGeneres
  6. "Nothing is a waste of time if you use the experience wisely." Rodin
Okay? Now, take your quote. What does it mean to you? Can you imagine a character trying to live by it, and having trouble? What kinds of trouble? Go ahead, build on that. Mix well with the LOCK and the disturbance with two doorways. Scramble well, season as needed, and . . . we'll be posting on Saturday.

Do it. Talking about it isn't enough.

Come on, six weeks, you can do it. One little story this week. See you at the storyboards.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Originally posted 9 August 2007

[drat, drat, I forgot to post this - sorry for the delay. Is it next week yet?]

Waddling Slowly through Plot & Structure (11)

Let's see. Somewhere in Plot & Structure by James Scott Bell? Oh yes, chapter 4, did getting your reader hooked and establishing a bond between the reader and the lead character. So it must be time for . . .

Presenting the story world! Or as Bell says, "What sort of world does your lead inhabit? Not merely the setting, though that is important. But what is life like for the lead?"

In other words, what is the life and routine that are about to become disturbed? What kind of work does the lead do? What do they want, what are they dreaming about? When they say, "there's no place like home," where do what they want to go?

Along with that, the beginning often sets the tone. This is the narrator's voice, his or her attitude, what kind of a book is this -- melodramatic action or laid-back contemplation? A mystery with a murder on every page or a romance with a kiss on every page? Serious, comic, dramatic, hard-boiled, overdone?

[We interrupt this chapter for a sidebar. Bell borrows from The 38 Most Common Fiction Writing Mistakes by Bickham the recommendation to start the story from the first sentence. Sounds simple, and yet often the story stalls with excessive description with no character or action in view, backward looks attempting to fill in the back story before actually starting the plot, or a lack of threat, with no disturbance or difficulty in sight. Get the story started!]

The next thing that the beginning does is to compel the reader to move on into the middle. An interesting lead character has a problem, a disturbance that pushes them into the middle, and the reader is dragged along. The beginning shows us the first door of no return, and the lead character walking through it. And the reader wants to know what will happen next.

But what about the information that we know the reader needs? Can't we just give him a dump of information? Just a chunk of exposition to move things along? Bell suggests that sometimes, if you keep it short, you can get away with this. The problem is that most of us don't really keep it short. In response, Bell developed three rules to help control his own expository tendencies. Here they are, although you'll need to read the book for details:
  1. Act first, explain later. Always start with a character in motion, and then drop in little bits of information as necessary.
  2. When you explain, use an iceberg. Give the reader the 10% that is necessary to understand what is happening, and leave 90% hidden for now.
  3. Set information inside confrontation. Within intense conflict, the character can drop crucial information in front of the reader.
Skip past some examples . . .

And some exercises! Here we go.
  1. Take a look at the opening chapter of your work in progress, or write one now, or even borrow one from a book that you like. What techniques do you use to grab the reader from the very first paragraph? Is there a feeling of motion? If not, try using some of the techniques from this chapter to rewrite.
  2. What is the story world? Do you really know it in detail? What in your beginning gives the reader a detailed sense of it, without blocks of descriptive dump?
  3. How do you introduce your lead character? What makes this character memorable? Brainstorm five possibilities for your lead character in each of the following categories:
    a.        Identification: how is the lead "like us?"
    b.        Sympathy: Jeopardy, hardship, underdog status, vulnerability
    c.        Likability: wittiness? Cares for other people?
    d.        Inner conflict: what two voices or agendas are battling inside your lead character?
  4. What disturbs your character' s world? What change has set off ripples or waves?
  5. Why is your opposition doing what they're doing? What explains the way they are acting? What aspects of their character are charming, attractive, or seductive? Remember that your villain is a hero in their own eyes.
Okay? So that is Chapter 4, all about beginnings. Frankly, I often think that we should start with the other parts of the story and then finish with the beginning. It's the hardest part of the story to get right, and probably will need the most revision, so don't sweat it too much if the first draft doesn't seem to have everything just perfect. I've seen at least one editor advise that you should spend 90% of your effort on the beginning, since that is the part that pulls the reader in - and if they don't make it past that, having a great middle and end probably won't matter. I think that's an exaggeration, but you definitely need to work on the beginning. I find that often just finding the right place to start takes a few versions and revisions.

So, let's see. We start with a LOCK: a lead character, with an objective, running into confrontations, with a knockout ending. Take the world and disturb it, then force them through the doorway of no return into the middle, and finally into another doorway of no return that leads to the ending. Wheel and deal and expand those ideas, then sort them out by looking for passion, potential, and precision. Once you get into writing the story, make sure that the beginning drags the reader in, gives them a bond with the lead character, shows them the story world, sets the tone, forces the reader on into the middle, and introduces the loyal opposition.

Write!
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Okay, so I forgot to write you about the book last time. It's Plot & Structure by James Scott Bell, part of the write great fiction series by Writer's Digest books. And so far we've managed to get through the introduction where Bell suggested that at least the craft of writing really can be learned and Chapter 1 where Bell laid out LOCK (lead, objectives, confrontations, and the knockout ending) along with the spices of characters, settings, and dialogue.

And now we' re coming up on Chapter 2! The chapter title gives us a hint, "Structure: What Holds Your Plot Together." Structure puts the parts of a story together in a way that readers follow. Bell suggests that plot is about elements, the things that need to be mixed in to make the story, while structure is about orderly arrangement and timing, so we put the pieces in the right places.

If you haven't heard about it already, Aristotle told us to use a three act structure. And we're still using it. Act one, the setup. Act two, the body or complications. And act three, tada, the payoff, the resolution, the end of the rainbow. Or to be more formal about it . . .

Beginnings. Introduce the who of the story. They also present the story world, getting us into the setting, the time, and the context. They set the tone, suggesting what kind of a story this is and what kind of a narrator. Compel the reader to move on to the middle,  often through a story question or puzzle. And they usually introduce the opposition, the person or situation that opposes the lead.

Next comes the middle. This is the battlefield for the confrontations. It's also where subplots mix in and complicate the picture. This is also where you need to deepen the character relationships, keep the reader interested and caring about what's happening, and set up a final battle or confrontation.

Oddly enough, the third act is the end. This is where you resolve the story. Usually, they tie up loose ends but also give a feeling of resonance, leave us thinking about the story even after we close the book.

I'll skip lightly past the discussion comparing the hero's journey or mythic structure with the three act structure. Especially since Bell gives a nice version for you to remember as a disturbance and two doorways. The disturbance is what is often called the inciting incident in writing texts. Don't get stuck on the jargon, but the idea that the lead needs something to disturb the ordinary world, the status quo, and get them moving is a very common one. So we need a disturbance to kick off our stories.

The disturbance is not the first gateway though. Usually, the hero can return to normal life, can ignore the call, until something forces him through a doorway of no return. Something happens that forces the character out of the ordinary world and into confrontation in such a way that he or she cannot go back or ignore it until the situation has been resolved. The first doorway is when they are forced out of the ordinary world and into the confrontations, which fill the middle. The second doorway, oddly, intensifies this, forcing them out of the confrontations into the final battle, the final showdown, the finish.

So the disturbance gets the action moving. And when the Lead gets forced into a confrontation where they cannot simply walk away, where they can't turn it over to the police or Grandma or whoever is handy and just sit back and wait, that's where they go through the first doorway and start slugging. Then when something happens to set up the final confrontation, that's the second doorway.

So the beginning has a disturbance that introduces the lead, his world, and the tone of the story.  We learn about his objectives here, too. The middle begins with an incident that forces the Lead into conflict with the opposition through a doorway of no return. Finally, some setback, crisis, discovery, or clue pushes the Lead through the second doorway of no return into the knockout ending.

Believe it or not, that's chapter two. Take LOCK and add in the notion of the disturbance and two doorways, or the three-act structure. Okay?

Exercises? Sure. Let's see what Bell suggests.

First, try analyzing some novels or movies in terms of the three act structure or a disturbance and two doorways. When you get bored in reading some novel or watching some movie, try to figure out why. Is there something in the LOCK or the three-act structure that's missing?

Second, take a look at a plot you're working on. Are you using structure? If you're deliberately breaking it, why and how do you think the readers will react?

Third, go ahead and design a plot. Lay out a disturbance scene and events for two doorways of no return. Write them down in summary form, and then play with them to make it original and interesting. Does it look like a story to you?

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 4th, 2026 08:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios