[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 27 February 2010

Let's see. Over here at the Mad Genius Club, writers division, there's some discussion about how to start a story.

http://madgeniusclub.blogspot.com/2010/02/cheat-post-beginnings.html

In medias res -- in the middle of the action, a problem, a question, a conflict? Maybe a name, setting, cognitive dissonance? Establish a goal, create an emotional connection? What about a concrete, immediate desire that is threatened? Go where it hurts?

And over here, http://www.fmwriters.com/Visionback/Issue27/writinghooks.htm we have a warning against crooks -- a hook that lies. When you use conflict, excitement, suspense... but you set up a false expectation of what the story is going to be, that's a crook. And when the reader notices that you're not delivering on that sparkling bait, they'll throw your story against the wall and you probably won't be able to get them to read another one. And there's a discussion of using your people, plot, setting, or style -- the thing that sets your story apart -- to help find a hook.

What about ARCS? This is a model of motivation, that I often find useful. Attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. Give people that, and they're motivated to try new things, to do something you want them to do, etc.

So a hook needs something to get their attention -- that cognitive dissonance, the dead fish on the coffee table, the bullet hole in the windshield, something that stands out and makes you curious. That certainly seems to be a piece of the hook.

Relevance. This is probably where the point of view character comes in, because we want to empathize with them. Make us feel like this is someone we can relate to, who has problems that we can relate to, abilities that maybe we don't have but we wish we had, and so forth. Or maybe sometimes the relevance comes from this is a setting that I know, or this is a problem that I know, or even this is something I wish I knew about? Anyway, in that little beginning, try to show the reader how this story, these characters, their problems are relevant to the reader.

Confidence. I suppose the key here is the genres. I feel pretty confident about reading mysteries, science fiction, and some others because I know how those stories go, I know how to read them and I enjoy them. But if the story starts out telling me that it is going to be a pastoral romance, for example, or a high-tension thriller with gangland killings everywhere... I am likely to set the story aside. There will be those who read it, but it's not my kind of story. Or if I can't tell what kind of a story it is, then I start to get itchy. So again, the hook needs to quickly establish what kind of a story it is. Setting expectations...

Which leads us to satisfaction. The beginning of the story makes a contract with the reader, it promises certain kinds of payoff. Admittedly, the beginning typically doesn't provide much of the satisfaction -- that's more for the climax. But the hook tells us what we might expect. Am I going to see a romantic pairing and a happily ever after, the bad guys punished and good triumphant, a mystery resolved? What do I think I'm going to find out when I read this book? That question or problem or situation needs to be something that will satisfy me, and then I look for the resolution to complete the satisfaction.

Hooks. How do you get the reader involved, right from the beginning? What are the pieces that you have to have there?

It's a puzzle! So how do you develop your hooks?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Let's see. Writers Digest June 2004 has a page and a half selection from someone's submission, along with a critique by G. Miki Hayden on pages 54-55. We won't bother with the submission, but the critique is kind of interesting.
"The main contribution the first few pages of any novel must make is to hook the reader. So often, as writers, we focus on developing our characters were being splashy, when, really, at this point, we have to ask ourselves what effect our writing will have on our audience. Have we provoked a question that needs to be answered?"
The heading on this first section is called "Set out the Bait." That's the critical question. "Readers must have a strong need to know what happens next." You need to entice, reach out and grab the reader, make them want to keep reading. Being smooth, clever, interesting dialogue, nice description and so forth is good, but somewhere you need to set that hook, to get the reader involved.

Hayden's second point concerns using flashbacks in the early story. Hayden says, "Flashbacks can have a kind of dead or irrelevant quality about them. They aren't immediate and don't incite a reader's emotion in the way a current (past tense, of course) scene will do. ? Any backstory injected for development early on mustn't stop the forward motion dead in its tracks."

Hayden suggests that the regurgitation of past incidents may come from authors trying to show too much. Sometimes motivation, explanations for action or emotions, and similar background really doesn't need to be shown to the reader in detail. Don't get lost on the side trips, at least until the reader knows where the main action is going.

Third point concerned the setting. This particular story was in a small city, Midwest setting. Unfortunately, it could've been any small town or city anywhere in the world. While Hayden doesn't recommend encyclopedic descriptions, there need to be some details that help us realize that this is a unique town and unique characters. Instead of looking down the street and seeing people, policeman, firemen, the character needs to look down the street and see Helen Winters wearing a flowered hat even in the middle of winter. Or something else that gives us the essence of this town, this city, and the people who live there. Not anytown, but yourtown!

Since this story was a mystery, the other pieces of information that need to be there are the clues, the trappings of the genre that let the fans know you are going to play square with them. So there are two kinds of information that should be there. Information that the readers need, and information that the readers of the genre expect. Make sure there are enough bits to give the readers the setting and characters and genre, and no more!

Finally, Hayden talks about how to rewrite the beginning. The first question is whether we've picked the best point of departure. Think about the alternatives, think about whether starting a little earlier or later would work better. Do we have reasons to be interested in the characters, and to keep reading? Hayden suggests that one of the best tools for rewriting is a sharp scalpel, and that we excise anything that doesn't contribute to the story.
"While details helped to build pictures in the reader's mind and make the characters and story real and concrete, painting in a sentence or two with key elements can be worth more than several paragraphs that detract or distract from the actual plot line. The balance here may be a fine one, but such an equilibrium between blabbing too much and establishing a foundation is worth seeking."
So there you have it. From the titles of the sections: set out the bait; don't stop the progression; give them the info; and how to rewrite. Four suggestions about points to look at when you're working on the beginning of your story. Make sure you get the reader interested, avoid distractions, put in the details that need to be there, and don't be afraid to rewrite.

Write!
tink

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 26th, 2025 04:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios