[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 3 August 1994

[just for clarification--I started to write this about July 14th. I don't even remember what the point of the argument then was, but it may still be topical, current, and not totally out of date...]

Notes on Flame Bores...
or:
How to Waste Bandwidth and Irritate Everyone

On the networks, flame baiting (posting something deliberately provocative) and flame wars are often dismissed, ridiculed, and prohibited--and far too common.

There is an underlying cycle in these cataclysmic amusements that seems to occur here (also on other network groups, but we're mostly interested in this group). This cycle runs something like:

1. Many, many submissions, crits, and other "writerly" pieces flying (this seems to be a precondition)

2. Someone posts something--a bit provocative, a bit witless, or something. (Note that this often is a posting which would pass by without comment or with very little notice on any other day of the year)

3. For some reason (often inexplicable), someone else responds with a touch of acidity or bitterness. Not especially harsh, but perhaps a bit stronger than the provocation seems to require. Often the response is fired off rapidly after writing it, without much consideration to toning down the irritation.

4. The world goes nuts. Personal attacks, grandstanding, sweeping generalizations, and all the other fallacies and befuddlements come whooshing out of whatever closet they normally are locked in. This is the classic "flame bore" syndrome seen on so many lists.

[This is usually the point where we can really identify the original post as "flame bait." In many cases, it is really a pretty innocent posting--somehow the timing, situation, and other factors have turned a minor irritant into a major trigger.]

5. [patent-pending step found here on WRITERS] Humorous seltzer bottles, laborious sandtraps of illogical analogies, and other patent-pending methods of extinguishing the blazes (or at least burying them under words) are deployed by those members of the list who manage to avoid falling under the influence of the expanding whirlpool of emotive distress. This is relatively unique on the networks. It works surprisingly well--most of our blazes get damped down in a very short time compared to some of the hotheaded conflagrations visible on other lists. Typically avoids the worst of number 6...

6. [common result on many lists] At this point, there is often a slide into flaming exits, calls to "true writers" for some kind of crusade, and other diversionary hazards. Very dangerous, although sometimes the explosive effects do disperse the original minor flickers at the expense of more major damages. (There is a certain grim irony in this step, as step one almost ensures that the "flame bore" starts as a very minor part of current postings).

Not particularly amusing, but I do see this repeated cycle in postings on the list.

My advice to everyone: Hang on when you see one starting and (as far as possible) ignore the flaming bores. Do watch for the occasional sparkling bit of writing or other wonderful fireworks display touched off by the flaming bores, but be careful playing with the embers, as they may burn your fingers.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 6 September 2008

Eight Rules of Writing?

I've forgotten exactly how I got on it, but I get e-mail odds and ends from Writer's Digest on a regular basis. The headline on one that came by recently intrigued me, so I went over to read it. Apparently someone summarized the eight key rules for writers at a recent conference. Here's the URL http://writersdigest.com/article/steve-berrys-8-rules-of-writing and there is a place there to sign up for your very own news, tips, and special offers. But let's take a look at these rules. Note that the numbered lines are from the webpage -- the commentary is me babbling. Feel free to disagree.

1. There are no rules. You can do anything you want as long as it works.

I think this may be the most important rule -- and the most important modifying phrase, "as long as it works." This is the engineering or pragmatic rule of thumb -- does it work? If it doesn't work, it really doesn't matter how pretty it is, how much time you spent on it, or anything else, it doesn't work. So make sure it works first.

2. Don't bore the reader. You can bore the reader in a sentence, in a paragraph, by misusing words, poorly choosing words, using the wrong length, etc.

MIT used to pay a writing consultant to come in and give a workshop for students and faculty. One of the first and last points that he reminded that group of was that business readers don't have to read your writing. Teachers and other students often read the whole thing, no matter how bad it is, because they have to. Regular readers just stop reading. So the first sentence, and every sentence, paragraph, scene, chapter break -- make it interesting. Make the reader want to keep reading.

3. Don't confuse the reader. Don't misuse point of view. Don't do too much at once.

Keep it simple. Sure, changing points of view, 39 plot lines woven into a complex braid, flashbacks and flashforwards and flashsideways all can be exciting and fun for the writer. But confused readers stop. You want the reader to enjoy it, which means they have to understand and follow it -- easily.

4. Don't get caught writing. Don't let you, the author, enter the story.

He would never come home again. Now how does the protagonist know the future like that? I always like the ones where someone walks into a city, and suddenly describes neighborhoods, history, the sewer system -- just from walking a few feet in. Amazing perception.

5. Shorter is always better. Write tight. It makes you use the best words in the right way.

Purple prose and gonzo writing fill up pages, but you probably don't want to overdo it. Papa Hemingway and The Little Book may be a bit sparse, but do try to keep it tight. You don't have to write haiku, but at least consider the lessons of poetry and keep the words close. And remember Twain's advice about the difference between lightning and a lightning bug.

6. Don't lie to the reader. It's okay to mislead, but don't lie. If you say the character's motivation is A and it turns out to be B (and you haven't foreshadowed it at all), the reader will feel cheated.

I think writers get into this because they're looking for that unexpected twist, and it feels easier to just lie to the reader, use that unreliable narrator and drag the reader into the morass of misunderstanding. But that's not the point! You want to play the mystery game, where all the clues are right out there in front of the reader, but until the great sleuth explains how it all fits together, no one realizes why the sleeping dog is important. Play fair with the reader -- don't lie to them.

7. Don't annoy the reader. Don't use names that are hard to pronounce or write choppy sentences throughout the entire book. It keeps people from getting close to your characters.

An upset reader? That's a confused reader taken one step further, isn't it? Names that are hard to pronounce are hard to remember. Several names that are very close to each other is also puzzle for the reader -- was this Amos the senior, Amos the younger, Amos the cousin -- oh, who cares! If all of the sentences are the same length, there's a certain singsong effect that builds up.

8. You must tell a good story. Bad writing can be forgiven with a good story. A bad story with the most beautiful writing cannot.

This is an interesting one because it is often to justify not doing one's best with grammar, spelling, and the other tedious details of the craft of writing. And to some extent, it may be true that editors and publishers will work with the writer who has a really good story to fix up the little stuff. But if the story just isn't there, then the best grammatical construction, proofreading, and other craftsmanship won't sell the missing story. So make it a story that you would like to read, that really makes readers interested and excited, and do the best you can with the nails and painting around the edges, but don't sweat it trying to get the last comma in or out. The easier it is to read, the more likely that the editor will see your great story without getting stuck on the grammar, spelling, and interesting font choices you've made in presenting it -- but you do need a great story under the wrappers.

Sorry, hopefully my little comments haven't hidden the eight rules. It's an interesting selection. And I think it's a good place to start, especially with that first reminder -- make sure it works.

So what do you think? Are there any of these that don't quite seem right for you? How would you illustrate or phrase each of these? Are there any other rules that really belong in the mix? What are they and why do they belong in your list?

Something to think about as we charge into a fall full of writing.

[Little Book? Look for the Elements of Style by Strunk and White. Excellent book. Looks like the original 1918 version is available online, while the 1950s versions with White cost something? Most used book stores have it cheap.]

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 10:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios