mbarker: (Burp)
[personal profile] mbarker
Original Posting Dec. 11, 2017

Writer's Digest, February 1994, on pages eight, 10, 11 has an article by Nancy Kress about tense. The subtitle helps explain, "How to tell your story in the past, the present – or both."

The question of course is which tense to use. "Some of these decisions are judgment calls."

Now, the convention really is to tell the story in past tense. Readers expect this. So why would you use present tense? Well, for effect. What is the effect? Janet Burroway says, "the effect of the present tense, somewhat self-consciously, is to reduce distance and increase immediacy; we are there." Damon Knight, on the other hand, says, "the present tense in third person seems to imply the existence of an invisible observer a little more strongly than the past does." A little distance? Maybe.

Well, some people find present tense good for increasing immediacy. Others think it creates distance. How do you feel about it? Does it suit your story? Sometimes, such as time travel stories, present tense certainly can be useful.

Another possibility lies in mixing tenses. An older first-person narrator talking about childhood experiences. Be careful, this is attention grabbing, especially in third person. It tends to put some distance, and break the illusion of the story as reality.

Nancy also mentions two special cases of tense mixing. First is presentation of characters' thoughts. The other, and the one that she spends a little bit of time talking about, is flashbacks. Handled correctly, the conventions here help the reader follow the time shifts without getting distracted from the story. If the story is in past tense, a short flashback may be in past perfect. On the other hand, a longer flashback may start with a couple or three verbs in past perfect, and then the middle in plain old past, with the last few verbs in past perfect again just to inform the reader that we are about to transition. However, if your main story is in present tense, just make your flashback past tense.

"Only you can choose whether your story should be in present tense, past tense, or some mixture of the two. If you're undecided, write it in the more conventional past. Then hand-edit a copy, changing all the verbs to present tense, and read both aloud. Which creates the effect you want?"

All right? Default to past tense, use present tense if you like, especially for effect. Don't forget to signal flashbacks with a little mixed tense.

Practice? Well, Nancy almost lays out an exercise. Write a scene or even an entire story in past tense. Then go through it and modify the verbs to present tense. Read both of them aloud. How does the effect change? Which one gives you the effect you want?

Write!
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 6 May 2009

Writer's Digest, September 2005, pages 42 and 43, an article by Michael J. Vaughn with the title, "In the Now." Unlike most recommendations that we should use past tense, Michael recommends present tense.
"I saw present tense narrative is a showy, intrusive gimmick..."
So why would you use present tense?
  1. Put the reader in the story. Present tense puts readers there right now.
  2. Narrator knowledge. Interest in the story often depends on withholding information, making the reader curious, then revealing the secrets later. The past tense story sometimes makes the reader feel that the narrator is holding back secrets already known. Present tense creates the illusion that events are unrolling with the narrator and the reader both finding out at the same time.
  3. Characterization. The use of present tense in dialogue helps to define a certain character or style.
  4. Killing the pluperfect. If most of the story is in past tense, flashbacks should be in pluperfect -- all the verbs have "had" tacked on to them. It's certainly common to start in pluperfect and then slide into plain past tense, but there's still that funny introductory time with all the hads scattered across the page. However, if the body of the story is in present tense, past events can simply be told in past tense.
Michael suggests that most readers won't even notice. Your choice. But think about using present tense instead of simply using past tense.

And write, wrote, had written!
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 09:29:48 EST

[just some thoughts looking for a peaceful discussion...join me?]

POV. You hear the letters bandied around, and there are exercises and whatnot about it. But...why bother?

Point of View.

I think I'd break down the main flavors as: third person (Omniscient, limited omniscient) or first person.

The preferred, or default, usually is third person, limited omniscient.

Third person (omniscient or limited omniscient) uses "he", "she", "they". The story (or whatever) is told from _outside_ the actors, as if one were a god/dess hovering outside the action (or perhaps just a camera floating over their shoulder).

One of the critical questions for third person is whether the narrator "knows everything" (omniscient) or the narrator is a walking camera (limited omniscient).

A related question is whether or not the narrator has access to thoughts or not.

And while we're considering the narrator, it is also important whether the narrator is a relatively neutral POV (sort of the ideal newsperson?) or has their own biases and faults. Since the third person POV ideally does not intrude much on the action, it may seem as if the narrator would normally be neutral--but it is something to consider occasionally.

First person (I, me, myself) is often assumed to be easier. After all, I know how to talk as myself, so telling a story as if I were the protagonist must be easy.

I think first person may be harder. It is difficult to remember to stay inside the one person selected as the protagonist. It is difficult to come up with good ways or reasons for the protagonist to somehow know everything (without helpful cohorts whispering secrets to them). It also is difficult to show the reader what the "I" knows, without massive monologues, ranting into mirrors, and such devices.

Tense, of course, falls into past or present (with the classic writer preferring the past tense, and modern experimentalists playing with present tense).

One could imagine a future tense story...but it would be difficult. Perhaps one of the best uses I can think of for future tense would be a story told from the POV of a dying person--with the third person future tense for the hoped for future contrasted to a few lines of present tense first person as the person dies at the end of the piece.

That's more than enough from me.

How do you decide what POV to use? When do you use different ones, and why? Do you ever write something from one POV, then redo it using another?

How do you decide what tense to write in? When would you use present tense, or past tense?

Oh, and poetically inclined folks? I realize it may not be obvious, but I think the question of POV and tense are as applicable to poetry as well as narrative. What kinds of POV does the poet use? What does tense do for (or against) you in writing your poetry?

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 29th, 2025 09:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios