[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 30 Dec 2009

A.k.a. pacing...

Writers Digest, December 2008, pages 61-62 has an article by Steve Almond with the title, "Pacing." It comes with a sidebar about pacing mistakes, and exercises. So... first the article.

Steve starts out by reminding us that Anton Chekhov recommended throwing out the first three pages of every initial draft. The reason? Well, mostly because we all spend a while getting started, and fairly often the real beginning of the story is buried a ways in. So...consider slashing the start. Some questions to consider -- is the protagonist alone for the first pages? Is he in bed or bathtub? Is he worrying, and mostly thinking about stuff? If so, you might want to cut, slash, and burn.

Second, Steve passes on some wisdom from Jim Shepard about pacing. Pacing is the rate of revelation. So when readers are learning new things, the pace is fast. When the revelations slow down, the pace slows down. Note that chronology and rate of revelation are not necessarily related.

So -- look for the real beginning of your story, and keep the pace moving by revealing new things to the reader.

And on to pacing mistakes:
  1. Covering too much ground. When stories are sketchy, just outlines, they don't engage readers. So make sure that you are setting scenes, not just outlining them. Remember, readers don't really want a list of facts, they want living characters.
  2. Front-loading the background. Readers need to know what the main character knows before plunging too far into the scene, but... don't infodump. Get to the story, then give the necessary background.
  3. Cutting the B+ material. Go ahead and write the bloat -- and then cut it. You want to make your stories tight, and stay focused on top-notch material. "That's what proper pacing is all about: making sure the reader is pulled through the story, as if by an invisible thread."
And, since you've been patient, here's the exercises...
  1. Look at your most recent rough draft. Try cutting the first three pages-- where would it start? Or at least, take a look at the background material in the first few pages. Is it essential? Cut the extra.
  2. Read your favorite short story (or novel) again. Look at the passage of time -- how long does the story really take? Then look at the revelations, and especially the rate of revelation in the climactic spots. How does the pacing work in that story?
  3. Print out two copies of a rough draft of a recent story. Then try cutting every word that isn't absolutely needed. Cut at least half the story. Then identify the most dramatic, climactic points and rewrite them. Try slowing the pace.
Go ahead. Keep things moving, and pace yourself.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
original posting 22 April 2008

Ramp up the action: Keep your scenes active to give your readers the heart-pounding intensity they demand.

That's the banner headline on the Writing Clinic article by Paul Bagdon in Writers Digest, Oct. 2004, pp. 55-57. Bagdon looks at the first chapter of a thriller , but I think the advice is good for any writer.

First, open with action. The piece that Bagdon is looking at has a little teaser about what that day was supposed to be, setting the stage for something cataclysmic to happen, but then it spends several paragraphs on background material. Bagdon says, "The problem is that now -- on the very first page -- isn't the time to present that material. The reader needs to be hooked -- dragged directly into the adventure --to the point where there's no possibility of her putting the book back on the shelf."

So the initial problem is to avoid spending too much time doing setup and background. Jump into the middle of the action and keep going. Especially in a novel, there's plenty of time later to come back and explain whatever background is really necessary, but the beginning of the story -- the place where you are convincing a reader that they really want to read this book -- that's not where you want to slow down and dump that information up all over the page. So cut, cut, cut.
"It's the writer's obligation to create dynamic and engaging situations and scenes in the first paragraphs and pages of an action-adventure novel. Readers (and editors) not only expect such leads --they demand them."
Second, consider the mix of Active vs. Passive. Readers of thrillers are looking for action, what Bagdon calls "good ol' spine-tingling, I-can't-put-this-book-down action." But he adds that in the mix of the thriller we also need a fully articulated protagonist and a plot with rich enough dynamics to support all that tension, intrigue, and violence.

Next, Bagdon points out that action needs to be written in an active way, presented as direct experience perceived by a character through physical senses, emotions, fears, and feelings to make it vital and engaging. Don't let up -- keep the reader right there beside the person having the experience. Beware of stepping back and narrating or describing, keep it acutely active. Write totally in the protagonist's senses and emotions. Make it purely active, a vehicle that lets the reader move, feel, hear, and see what the protagonist does.

But ?

Not just nonstop feverishness and vehemence. "Unintrusive narrative is as much an essential part of a successful thriller as is dialogue or description."
"Visceral, active scenes keep your thriller focused and provide the reader with the heart-pounding intensity he seeks."
So, we've really got two simple pieces of advice. Start with action, and then make sure that your action is really active!

And, of course, write!

When we write, we act.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original Posting 21 October 2007

The NHK (public television) folks put some odd programs on. Right now there's a visit with a circus camp in Monaco. One bit particularly caught my imagination - they were talking to the fellow who arranges most of the "big shows" for this group, laying out the musicians, lighting, acts, and all. They asked him about the underlying stories, and he responded quite emphatically that he doesn't have any stories in his shows. No, he said, "All I do is provide spectacles - great sounds, great sights - and the audience tells themselves stories." And yet he is known for engaging the audience, exciting them - and even the little clips of his shows that we saw were quite amazing.

Tibetan instruments with people trained in the monks' style of chanting - they said the leader could go for 20 minutes with a single "ooooooooo" booming away from his stomach. This with a single horse prancing in place, the rider quiet, under a spotlight.

Or a huge moon, with a woman suddenly swirling into sight in front of it, and then the lights move to a single figure muffled in white with huge billowing wings fluttering around it as it spins and dances in the center and snow falls. Then it crumpled to the ground, a white pile, and a horse wandered into the spotlight and up to the pile, as if to pull the figure back out, then stopped. And the lights went out.

Fun stuff. And I think I need to contemplate that notion of providing spectacle and letting the audience tell themselves stories.

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 09:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios