mbarker: (Burp)
[personal profile] mbarker
 Original Posting April 7, 2019

Lights Out!All is lost! There is no way to win. The forces against us are too strong. The dilemma that we face has no good choices. This is the beat that really makes your readers sweat. What's the worst thing that could happen? And it does!Now why do you put this in here? Well, looking at the Hero's Journey, this is death and rebirth. The final cleansing. And there's a real catharsis here. Beyond death, the recovery makes us sing.James suggests that whether you are a plotter or a pantser, keep looking for possible endings. Plotters may do this while outlining. Pantsers, do it all the time. Keep a list of your ideas. One of these may be your real ending. But one of the others may be your Lights Out beat, when everything seems to have fallen apart.And James's reminder? Well, endings often involve sacrifice. Rebirth comes after death. Death is often the sacrifice of what we want most. That's when the lights go out.Like Mounting Forces, this section provides examples, but is somewhat sketchy. It's very much going to depend on your story. Think about the death that your lead faces -- physical, professional, psychological -- what they thought they were going to do about it, and what could happen to make them sure they can't win. Betrayal, broken promises, the secret weapon isn't there, whatever makes the darkness blacker, blacker, blackest. Which makes the victory even sweeter and brighter in The Final Battle!It's interesting to me that he puts this after The Doorway of No Retreat #2. I'm not sure that it has to be quite that late. You may want to put this earlier, somewhere in Act II.What's next? The Q Factor!
mbarker: (Fireworks Delight)
[personal profile] mbarker
 Original posting Dec. 13, 2018

I recently grabbed a copy of Super Structure by James Scott Bell, and am working my way through it. Looks great, and I think I will meditate on at least some of the points he makes here on the list. So...

"the overall plot of a novel is about how a character confronts death."

Skip a little...

"Now, there are three kinds of death: physical, professional, psychological."

Aha. Okay, so the point is that stories need stakes that are high enough to really engage us, as readers. Which means death. Physical death, in some cases, like thrillers, mysteries, and others. Pretty straightforward, someone is gonna kill somebody else.

Professional death? I may lose my job, career, love of music,... or sometimes the role that we play in life? Father, spouse, something that is critical to us. A bit more abstract than physical death, but nearly as common a threat or danger.

Or psychological? Hum, losing my self image? Losing my respect? Sure... how can this person become fully themselves, and what blocks that, what can tear them down? Sure...

James gives several examples of these points, and you really should read his book. Or perhaps you could take some stories or books you like, and consider just how this plays out there.

Hum... I wonder if you could take Maslow's hierarchy of needs and play that against James's three kinds of death? Physiological needs matches up with his physical death. Safety, love/belonging, esteem? Sort of matches up with professional death? They are all about the relationship with other people and society at least. And then there's that self-actualization top of the pyramid. Psychological death? Perhaps.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs has a description...

Physiological needs? Food, water, sleep, shelter, sex… Physical things!

Safety… Covers a range of needs. Personal security, emotional security, financial security, health and well-being, avoiding accidents and illness.

Social belonging. Friendships, intimacy, family… Professional status fits right in here.

Esteem. This is probably sliding over towards psychological death. Self-esteem, self-respect, competence, mastery, and so forth?

Self-actualization. Now we are into motivation, seeking to understand sense of self, pursuing a goal, seeking happiness. Okay, that sort of lines up with psychological death.

Sorry about the little side trip, but it's an interesting thought for me. It might add some richness to your exploration of the death stakes, too?

Why is it important to decide what kind of death, and how it plays out in your story, as early as possible? Well, James suggests:

“Being able to define the type of death that overhangs your main plot will keep you on track when you write your novel. It will bring you back to the path if you happen to get lost along the way.”

Okay? So just what kind of death does your protagonist face? Physical, professional, or psychological? What will it cost if they lose, or what will they win if they succeed?

Something to consider, right?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original Posting 1 February 2009

Killing Characters

Writer's Digest, August 2005, pages 44 to 45, has an article by Sandra Dark with the title, "Life after Death." The focus is on how killing a key character can actually help your story. It starts right out with the observation that, "For both reader and writer, nothing jerks the rug out from under complacency quite like turning a key character into a corpse." But at the same time, sometimes readers don't want favorite characters to get killed. So why would you kill off an important character?
  1. To add surprise. Readers like stories to surprise them, and the death of a character can raise questions that readers will want to see answered. In mysteries, obvious suspects all too often have to die. "The trick is to wield the ax (or the weapon, accident or disease of your choice) before the reader quits on you, and to make the death a pivotal point in the story."
  2. To allow an entirely new track. Characters in stories are often stuck in ruts. The death of a key character often shakes up others, breaking them out of old habits and forcing them into new ways of life. Sometimes the kind of death also adds to the story or the character development.
  3. To eliminate a dead end. Some characters really don't have anywhere to go. Killing them helps the writer, and turns their part in the story into a serious question. Be careful with this. You don't want to create cardboard characters just so that you can kill them. Instead, think about Stephen King -- who "populates his stories with vivid, often endearing characters, providing himself with entire villages of people to kill." By making people who will die as three-dimensional as primary characters, you raise the suspense by keeping the reader guessing as to who is going to survive.
  4. To force a new mindset. Stories sometimes seemed to be running into a dead end. Killing an important character can force the writer to take a fresh look at the story. Who is the new viewpoint character? Which characters will carry the ball now?
  5. To create motivation. Killing someone can give the lead character strong motivation, pushing them to do unexpected things. In this case death acts as a catalyst, pushing the protagonist into action.
Whether you're writing mysteries or any kind of story, consider whether having one or more main characters die will help push your story. Be careful with this -- it's the 900 pound gorilla of story events. But sometimes you will really want to let loose the gorilla and see how the story bounces.

Exercise? Take your work in progress, and look at the various characters. Think about what would happen to your story if one of them died. Which one would cause the most disruption and difficulty for the other characters? What kind of a death -- terrorist attack, automobile accident, medical tragedy, skiing accident, etc. -- would help the others learn something?

to touch the stars with life
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 22 December 2008

I warned you! Now, it's time for a moldy article from Writers Digest, February 2005. Pages 20 and 21 are the column Fiction Essentials by James Scott Bell, and in this issue, he's highlighting the three secrets of suspense. Wouldn't you like to know what they are?
"What happens next? When you're writing a novel, that's the question you want in your readers' minds all the time. That's what keeps them flipping pages long into the night. That's suspense. And every novel needs it."
What do you think suspense is? Well, Bell starts out by telling us that "suspense in fiction is a feeling of pleasurable uncertainty." When we don't know what is going to happen -- although we may have suspicions -- and we really want to find out -- that's suspense!

Kind of like waiting for the three secrets of suspense :-) So without further ado, here they are!

1. The Death Threat

"The best suspense is about death." Physical death in various variations -- serial killer, villain, malevolent conspiracy -- death abounds. However, professional death -- loss of work or livelihood -- also works. Or psychological death, the inner death that results from not having a reason to go on living, not dealing with dark secrets from the past, not healing.
"Here is the key to creating a convincing threat to your character's life, whether it's physical, professional, or psychological: Include scenes early in your novel that explicitly show what the central problem means to your protagonist. Get your readers to feel what's at stake from the very beginning of the story."
When death in one guise or another awaits the character, we have to keep reading.

2. The Sympathetic Protagonist

"No matter what kind of danger is present, if readers don't care about your protagonist, they still won't worry much about what happens. To really care about your story, readers need to feel sympathy for its lead character." So what makes readers sympathize with -- feel emotionally bound with -- the hero?

First, a well-rounded character, with flaws and strengths. Neither perfection nor complete failures are terribly interesting. Second, guts -- make the hero active. Third, characters who care about someone else are more sympathetic than self-centered egotists.

3. Scene Tension

"Every scene in your novel should have tension, whether that comes from outright conflict or inner emotional turmoil." Outside tension comes from the character having a goal that matters to him or her and significant opposition to achieving it. Most scenes end with the character failing. Even success comes with a cost. I've seen it described recently as "yes, but..." Yes, we succeeded, but now there's a bigger problem! As for failure, that usually is "no, and furthermore..." Not only did we fail, but we're further away than before. Even relatively quiet scenes can have inner tension -- growing worried, concerned, irritability, anxiety.
"So put a sympathetic character into a life-or-death situation and maintain tension in all your scenes. You'll create the pleasurable uncertainty that readers love to feel, page after page."
Check your story against this checklist:
  1. Do you have a sympathetic protagonist?
  2. Are they facing life-or-death problems?
  3. Does every scene maintain the tension?
Your exercise -- take a character, imagine a situation that faces them with a life-or-death challenge, and make a list of at least three scenes where they try to solve the challenge, and fail. Go ahead and write those up -- if you add a beginning and ending, you'll have a whole short story.

No ideas? How about pick a number from one to six? And you have selected the
following situation:
  1. A building on fire, with people calling for help
  2. An automobile accident, with people pinned inside
  3. A building collapsing, with people trapped inside
  4. A train wreck, with people hurt
  5. A snow storm, with the power out, and people needing help
  6. A boat drifting, with engines out, and people looking for help
Go ahead -- walk your character into that situation, and let them try to help.

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 10:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios