mbarker: (Fireworks Delight)
[personal profile] mbarker
Original Posting Dec. 14, 2017

Over here, http://www.writingexcuses.com/2017/12/10/12-50-form-and-function/ the Writing Excuses crew tackled how form influences function, or at least, how media influences story. Then, towards the end of the podcast, they added a bonus section. Pretty simple, really. They asked each of the four panel members -- Mary, Wesley, Mary Anne, and Brandon -- to answer the question "Why do I love writing stories?" with a first-person discussion.

Their answers? Well, you can listen to the podcast, or read the transcript. Briefly, they said, "[Mary] It allows me to tilt the world on its side and see what's underneath, and the act of communicating that understanding makes me a better person. [Wesley] It allows me to be somebody I know I can't be in real life. I can be the hero, I can become a better person. [Mary Anne] Stories let me explore taboos, let me process things and say things that I can't any other way. [Brandon] Stories are the closest I can get to magic in real life. I can imagine something, and engage in telepathy with my readers!"

So, how does that make an exercise for us? Well, it seems to me that you might take that challenge -- answer the question, "Why do I love writing stories?" Doesn't have to be a long answer, but it should be a heartfelt answer, if you'll let me push you towards self-examination and reflection a bit.

Who knows, maybe you'll even feel like sharing that glimpse, that moment of looking into the writer's mirror and thinking about just why do I love doing this, with the rest of us?

Write?
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original Posting 17 Jan 2010

[a rambling...]

Blogging, tweeting, social networks, all the fuss and fury of people in all kinds of walks of life busily expressing themselves -- misspelling words, turning grammar inside out, letting sentences run madly through fields of commas, outstripping punctuation, and what they are using for topics, characters, settings, and so forth? Mama mia, it's a mess!

But.

Having read your brother's ramblings. Having scratched your head about that tweet from a friend that lacked a hint of the context. And used funny spelling -- UR2? LOL? Having read all the complaints and gripes about something that turns out to have been a misunderstanding to start with. Having endured all of that, you might just be ready to enjoy a well-written short story, novel, or even poetry.

I'm suspicious that when we say that only professionals, experts, those who are inspired by some strange muse above and beyond the normal drivel -- only those people should be allowed to practice writing, we are also likely to be restricting reading. And without reading, well, writing is a bit like painting in the dark, it may be somewhat engaging for the artist, but it's not particularly interesting for the audience.

On the other hand, when people are busily engaged in writing and reading as amateurs, that's when they really appreciate the well turned phrase, characterization, observation that makes settings come to life, and all the rest of the panoply of writerly tools.

It's the other side of the 90% rule -- to get a lot of good stuff, you've got to do a lot of wading through the other kind of stuff. But then you really appreciate the good stuff you find, or sometimes even come up with yourself. And if only a few people -- the professionals -- are writing, the amount of good stuff is limited. And if there isn't enough, you may lose critical mass, drop below the point that supports mass publication. So we really want lots of people to be reading, which means lots of people writing -- even if great bales of it are everyday trivia, with all of the confusion and misunderstanding and misspelling and misstatement and other mistakes that are likely to crop up.

Trying to sketch, dabbling with watercolors and oils and pastels, learning a little bit about perspective and masses and all that artistic stuff -- it makes me really appreciate what the artists are doing. It certainly doesn't make me a great artist, but it gives me a better understanding of what's going on, of what they are trying to do.

In the same way, the spreading culture of writing and reading that goes with blogging, tweeting, social networks, and all the rest of the digital froth helps ensure that there are lots of people who read, who have tried to tell a little story and appreciate that it's hard.

Will blogs kill writing? No way. Sure, the pile of 90% is getting bigger and bigger, but that also means that if you dig a little bit, you can find some saltpeter, to let you make gunpowder. And that leads to fireworks! Or maybe even a diamond in the rough?

If you want to kill writing, restrict it to a few specialists. Make it something that only the high priests and critics are allowed to practice. That would choke off the practice of reading and writing pretty fast.

But if you want to encourage it, let the blogs run rampant, the tweeters twit, and the social networks lace everything together. Then figure out how to find and reward the 10%. That's the hard part right now.

I think there's a lot more to say, but I've rambled enough for now. So... what do you think? Are you ready for reading and writing to become a popular sport?

Write!
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 11 December 2008

Just a quick quirky thought.

I was contemplating that description of writing -- the one that goes "put your character in a tree, throw rocks at him, and then get him down out of the tree?" (hum? Can't find a source, but there's a version of it at http://paulgorman.org/cheatsheets/fiction_plots.shtml and various other places -- one attributes it to "some wise old scribe")

Anyway, it struck me that the final phrase is poorly phrased. See, as a writer, that last phrase really should be "then show him getting himself out of the tree." It's important that the protagonist be the person taking the action in the end, not having it imposed on him -- by the author, narrator, Momma nature, or whatever. That's one of the ways to have the story dribble away in sadness -- just make the protagonist a puppet being played by the ending, rather than an active part of it.

So -- get your hero in a tree? That can be imposed, and fairly often is. Throw rocks at him? Again, external sources of those flying shards of fate are perfectly adequate. But the grande finale comes when the hero gets himself out of the tree -- by flying into the sunset, jumping to a broken leg, slithering through the branches, or some other amazing method, but the hero does it himself.

Watcha think?

Okay?
Write!

And spin, and kick, and step, two, three, four . . .
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Original posting 30 November 2007

Ha, ha, ho, ho, a meme indeed.

Over here at
http://jamesmaxey.blogspot.com/2007/11/five-things-ive-learned-about-writing.html James Maxey ponders the question of five things he's learned about writing.

And in a show of comradery, he's asked some friends to write up the same notion. One, Andy Remic, has posted his five points already over at http://andyremic.blogspot.com/2007/11/5-things-ive-learned-about-writing.html

Another, Lisa Shearin (with a new book at http://www.lisashearin.com/ ) seems to be doing it in five parts. Part one is up at http://www.lisashearin.com/2007/11/5-things-ive-learned-about-writing-part.html

It strikes me that this is an interesting exercise. Imagine, if you will, that you have been asked to formulate what you have learned about writing in five easy pieces (wasn't that a movie?). Or five steps to the novel? Or five somethings, leastwise.

Let me think - and you do the same, then we can compare notes!

write?
tink
(Let's see, five? That's one hand worth, eh? So the sound of one hand clapping?)

Profile

The Place For My Writers Notes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345 6 7 8
910 11121314 15
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 06:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios