mbarker.livejournal.comOriginal Posting Dec. 6, 2013
In March, 1997, Writer's Digest pages 32 to 35 had an article by Jack M. Bickham with the title "Mastering Show, Don't Tell." You may have seen his book on Scene and Structure or perhaps one of his novels.
Underneath the title there's a running head that says, "It's the most basic of fiction-writing advice, and the least easily understood. A novelist and fiction-writing instructor clears up the confusion on how to let your readers live your stories."
Jack says the advice is sound, but there's a lot of confusion about how to do it. So he starts out by explaining that "Show, don't tell" is shorthand for:
"Don't lecture your reader; she won't believe you. Give her the story action, character thoughts, feelings and sense impressions as the character would experience them in real life. Let her live the story for herself as she lives real life, by experience."
Then he explains.
First of all, most of our formal education and experience teaches us to present information in a way that just doesn't work when writing fiction. Formal schooling emphasizes telling. You tell the teacher facts you learn from reading, you stick to logical objective viewpoints, you find and analyze facts and present them as factually and briefly as possible.
Fiction turns the process upside down. Instead of avoiding feelings and sticking to facts, you need to be aware of feelings -- the lead character's emotions and viewpoint -- and figure out how to make your readers experience the story world from that viewpoint and emotional stance. Basically, you present evidence and let readers draw their own conclusions. Fiction convinces us in a way that objective writing doesn't.
But to do that, you have to let the readers experience the story world, the stimulus. And let them draw their own conclusions. You need to make the experience of the story like real life. Present evidence: show, don't tell. That's what the showing is all about. So how do you do that?
1. Get into the viewpoint and stay there. Jack recommends four essential steps:
-- select and adhere to a single character's viewpoint
-- imagine the crucial sense or thought impressions that character is experiencing each moment
-- present those impressions as vividly and briefly as possible
-- give those impressions to readers in a logical order
"Getting into the viewpoint of your central story character -- and staying there -- helps enormously in showing instead of telling. If you're solidly in viewpoint, you won't be so tempted to lecture readers because you will be revealing that character's experiences rather than reviewing some abstract, objectively written data... Viewpoint characters, like real people, experience things rather than telling about them."
Adhering to the viewpoint also removes the temptation to tell readers extra stuff that the viewpoint character doesn't know. In fact, it helps you imagine details that matter to the character. We live minute-to-minute, and characters experience life the same way. This helps you focus on making things vivid and evocative. It also helps with that logical order, which most of the time is simple chronological presentation.
2. Divine the dominant impression. Jack recommends that we cultivate a habit of identifying dominant impressions as we go through life. He gives some examples -- what's the dominant impression when you turn your car around a curve and suddenly the setting sun is directly in your eyes? What about you walk into an old cathedral in Europe at a quiet time? Or what about walking in your local shopping mall? Walking near a major reconstruction project? How about walking into a bakery?
Frequently, the source and quality of light is our first and dominant impression. However, sometimes other senses catch us. Silence, smells, noises. Moment to moment, what is the dominant impression?
3. Revealing characters. Instead of lecturing readers, just present the evidence. Even for the viewpoint character, emotions are often shown.
4. When to tell? There are some times when telling is appropriate. Most of the time, we show to convince the reader. But when the data is simply objective, maybe you should tell it. Or perhaps there is some really fascinating factual information? Some minor points may not need full treatment. And of course, sometimes we need to move quickly.
Incidentally, don't be surprised if one character tells another character something -- they aren't all writers!
"As a fiction writer, your goal is to immerse readers in your story world. That world must seem as much like the readers' real world as you can possibly make it. Readers experience the real world, and must experience your story world in a similar way: through evidence -- sense impressions or whatever -- that allow them to draw their own conclusions."
There you go. Stay in viewpoint, use the dominant impression, show us the other characters, and sometimes cheat a little. But most of the time, focus on experience, sensory impressions of the world.
Take a look at a work in progress. Are there places where you could substitute a little bit more showing? When your character comes through the door, what catches their attention? Make us feel that world, and let us draw our own conclusions.
Incidentally, there is a sidebar talking about first-person showing. Here's the first paragraph:
"Showing strong feeling, rather than lecturing readers about it, is possibly more difficult in first-person narration than anywhere else. Because the author is deep inside the head and heart of the I character so much of the time, it seems natural to blurt out feelings. In fact, the stronger the emotion being portrayed, the harder it is for the author to show rather than tell."
Then he gives an example, showing that events and cool first-person narration can give readers more impact and satisfaction than just describing the feelings.
Write!